processed-facts.json

[HanJin996]

Hello Author:
May I ask which facts correspond to fields 1.4.1 to 1.5.2 in processed-facts.json?
In ur paper Static (1) fact seems to end only at 1.3.2?

[HuijieYan]

Sorry, I just found that there is a inconsistance bug between the label ordering in paper and label ordering in processed-facts.json.
It might be due to we forget to rearrange the label ordering to final label ordering in the paper.
Label 1.4.1 and 1.5.2 in older version means class scope method (1.2.1) and test file name (1.3.2) respectively.

I will correct the label ordering in processed-facts.json to the ordering in the paper sooner.

[HanJin996]

ok I got it! Thanks for ur answering and kindness.

[HanJin996]

Hi, Huijie, I want ask something about the facts selection and the Angelic Forest's detail to u. I sent 2 emails to ur school email. I'd appreciate it if u could reply to me. Wish u all the best!

[HuijieYan]

Sure. I will reply to these questions very soon. Sent from Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: lqy ***@***.***> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2024 10:57:55 AM To: PyRepair/maniple ***@***.***> Cc: Yan, Huijie ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [PyRepair/maniple] processed-facts.json (Issue #19) ⚠ Caution: External sender Hi, Huijie, I want ask something about the facts selection and the Angelic Forest's detail to u. I sent 2 emails to ur school email. I'd appreciate it if u could reply to me. Wish u all the best! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#19 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARGMCTPO45SGBGFOFGPZHBDZKDATHAVCNFSM6AAAAABJFPDKYWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOJZGA4TCMZWHE>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[HanJin996]

Thank u so so much! hhhhh