Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a timeout_for method #619

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 24, 2021
Merged

Conversation

BobDotCom
Copy link
Member

Summary

Adds a timeout_for method to timeout members for an amount of time instead of until a set date. Untested

Checklist

  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why
  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed)
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting, examples, ...)

@BobDotCom BobDotCom added priority: low Low Priority status: awaiting review Awaiting review from a maintainer feature Implements a feature labels Dec 22, 2021
@BobDotCom BobDotCom added this to the v2.0 milestone Dec 22, 2021
@BobDotCom BobDotCom self-assigned this Dec 22, 2021
@BobDotCom BobDotCom added this to In progress in v2.0 via automation Dec 22, 2021
Lulalaby
Lulalaby previously approved these changes Dec 23, 2021
discord/member.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Dorukyum <53639936+Dorukyum@users.noreply.github.com>
@Lulalaby Lulalaby merged commit ad69c24 into Pycord-Development:master Dec 24, 2021
v2.0 automation moved this from In progress to Done Dec 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Implements a feature priority: low Low Priority status: awaiting review Awaiting review from a maintainer
Projects
No open projects
v2.0
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants