-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable test_composite_job #264
Enable test_composite_job #264
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2016522053Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kt474 Could you please resolve conflicts?
@kt474 did all tests in the updated file pass locally? If so, you can go ahead and integrate it from my perspective. The failures in the CI run in your fork look unrelated
|
Yeah all the tests pass locally |
Thanks for the confirmation, @kt474. Then it looks good from my side. Tried to merge but it's blocked by @rathishcholarajan rejected review. |
@rathishcholarajan up to you to merge now :) |
Summary
Skipping two tests that are timing out
Details and comments