Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 17, 2024. It is now read-only.

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Re-organize project: type labels #2426

Closed
abdonrd opened this issue Jan 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Re-organize project: type labels #2426

abdonrd opened this issue Jan 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
organization Issues related to team and project organization.

Comments

@abdonrd
Copy link
Member

abdonrd commented Jan 12, 2022

After:


Now we should re-organize the project: type labels.

Right now we have. And I propose the changes below each one.

After this we could end with this:

  • Qiskit/qiskit.org
  • Qiskit/platypus
    • With the issues that were in [project: textbook beta]
  • Qiskit/web-components
  • Qiskit/gh-actions
@abdonrd abdonrd added the organization Issues related to team and project organization. label Jan 12, 2022
@techtolentino
Copy link
Contributor

@abdonrd - this is a nice refactor of our labels, overall 👏🏽

Notes on the following, in my opinion:

  • project: documentation - I remember we discussed having a better way to start organizing our docs, but it seems like it's not gaining any traction. I guess until we arrive at a plan, we can remove it.

  • project: brand book - I believe this'll be up to @JRussellHuffman

  • project: textbook (old version) - this can assume issues at https://github.com/qiskit-community/qiskit-textbook

  • project: events - I imagine we'll have some events work in the future, but since none of it is prioritized as of now, I'm ok w/ removing

thanks for all this organizing Abdon 💪🏽

@Qiskit Qiskit locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 25, 2022
@techtolentino techtolentino converted this issue into discussion #2448 Jan 25, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
organization Issues related to team and project organization.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants