-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates for removing use-maxsplit-arg #12199
Conversation
Thank you for opening a new pull request. Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone. One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8731790615Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one also looks good, thanks.
Fwiw, I think there's a few in the "temporarily disabled" list that might not necessarily be the best style and might want moving into the "properly disabled" list, but it's been a long time since I looked at them, so I don't really remember. For example, the one above this one (use-implicit-booleaness-not-comparison
) is imo not a universally good idea and probably shouldn't be enabled as a lint requirement.
Yeah, figured these were pretty quick hitters... so might as well go ahead and just do it! No biggie to throw the branch away and go the other route! :D I can take a look at |
Summary
Part of the effort in #9614 to incrementally remove lints
Details and comments
Only used in one place. It makes sense if the line only cares about the extension. On the other hand, is also very much a nit in this case since most image files don't have multiple
.
in them and makes the line a bit longer.