Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable the new efficient MCX decompose #12628

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

t-imamichi
Copy link
Member

Summary

This PR enables #11993 as QuantumCircuit.mcx.
We can reduce the number of CNOT gates as follows.

from qiskit import QuantumCircuit

def bench_mcx(n: int):
    qc = QuantumCircuit(n)
    qc.mcx(list(range(n - 1)), n - 1)
    #print(qc.decompose(reps=1))
    print(n, qc.decompose(reps=4).count_ops()["cx"])

for i in range(6, 10):
    bench_mcx(i)

main

6 92
7 188
8 380
9 764

this PR

6 84
7 140
8 220
9 324

Details and comments

@t-imamichi t-imamichi requested a review from a team as a code owner June 21, 2024 08:57
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

I try to fix errors, but I cannot fix all errors. Need help by experts.

@Cryoris
Copy link
Contributor

Cryoris commented Jun 21, 2024

Thanks for spotting this, that's indeed an easy win! 🙂 Regarding the errors:

  • The decomposition failures are expected, since the MCX definition is now more efficient, the references need updating. I think you can just do this in place.
  • The QASM failures happen because the circuit now places an MCXGate(name="mcx") which, for 3 controls, is decomposed into C3XGate(name="mcx"). I think the naming conflict causes the strange QASM output. Two possible solutions would be renaming C3XGate(name="c3x") but this could have other repercussions or just accept the new QASM output and fit a regex to cover the number. But maybe @jakelishman has a better idea 🙂

@ShellyGarion ShellyGarion added mod: circuit Related to the core of the `QuantumCircuit` class or the circuit library synthesis performance labels Jun 23, 2024
@ShellyGarion ShellyGarion added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Jun 23, 2024
@ShellyGarion ShellyGarion added the Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog label Jun 23, 2024
@ShellyGarion
Copy link
Member

Thanks for handling this @t-imamichi !

One can fix the failing test test/python/transpiler/test_decompose.py as follows:

replace this line:

decom_circ = self.complex_circuit.decompose(["mcx"])

by: decom_circ = self.complex_circuit.decompose(["mcx"], reps=2)

replace this line:

decom_circ = self.complex_circuit.decompose(["mcx", "gate2"])

by: decom_circ = self.complex_circuit.decompose(["mcx", "gate2"], reps=2)

@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

t-imamichi commented Jun 24, 2024

Thank you for your suggestions, @Cryoris and @ShellyGarion.
I tried to update C3X name and C4X name, and found that it affects test_decompose.py. It raises errors even with reps=2 suggested by Shelly.

@ShellyGarion
Copy link
Member

Thank you for your suggestions, @Cryoris and @ShellyGarion. I tried to update C3X name and C4X name, and found that it affects test_decompose.py. It raises errors even with reps=2 suggested by Shelly.

my suggestion works with your current PR (without any further changes)

@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, I confirmed it. But the combination does not work unfortunately. I pushed a commit JFYI.

@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

t-imamichi commented Jun 24, 2024

Changing C3X and C4X names does not seem a good idea. There is an unpredicted error as follows.

test.python.qasm3.test_export.TestCircuitQASM3ExporterTemporaryCasesWithBadParameterisation.test_no_include
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Captured traceback:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Traceback (most recent call last):

      File "/Users/runner/work/qiskit/qiskit/test/python/qasm3/test_export.py", line 2166, in test_no_include
    res = Exporter(includes=[]).dumps(circuit).splitlines()

      File "/Users/runner/work/qiskit/qiskit/qiskit/qasm3/exporter.py", line 181, in dumps
    self.dump(circuit, stream)

      File "/Users/runner/work/qiskit/qiskit/qiskit/qasm3/exporter.py", line 195, in dump
    builder.build_program()

      File "/Users/runner/work/qiskit/qiskit/qiskit/qasm3/exporter.py", line 487, in build_program
    main_statements = self.build_current_scope()

      File "/Users/runner/work/qiskit/qiskit/qiskit/qasm3/exporter.py", line 850, in build_current_scope
    nodes = [self.build_gate_call(instruction)]

      File "/Users/runner/work/qiskit/qiskit/qiskit/qasm3/exporter.py", line 1060, in build_gate_call
    gate_name = ast.Identifier(self.global_namespace[instruction.operation])

      File "/Users/runner/work/qiskit/qiskit/qiskit/qasm3/exporter.py", line 270, in __getitem__
    return self._data[f"{key.name}_{ctrl_state}_{key.params}"]

    KeyError: 'cx_1_[]'

@mtreinish
Copy link
Member

KeyError: 'cx_1_[]'

You can ignore this error, it's a bug in the qasm3 exporter. It's been looked at here: #12481

@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

I succeeded in passing both test_decompose.py and test_export.py by changing name of C3X and C4X. But I'm not sure this is a right way. It might be a breaking change perhaps.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 25, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9658863540

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • 13 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 89.744%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
crates/qasm2/src/lex.rs 1 93.64%
crates/qasm2/src/parse.rs 12 97.15%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9650973845: -0.01%
Covered Lines: 63767
Relevant Lines: 71054

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@ShellyGarion ShellyGarion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @t-imamichi for taking care of this problem!
Your solution looks fine to me, but I'm also not sure if it breaks the API.
Anyway, some release notes are needed.
The failing tests are not related to this PR, and will be solved after you merge the main branch.

@ShellyGarion
Copy link
Member

Following the qiskit dev meeting, it was suggested that the gates names will remain "mcx" (and not "c3x" or "c4x") in order to keep the current API, and the name changes can be done in qiskit 2.0 release. Only the tests should be updated accordingly.
Could you please change the names, tests and add release notes?

@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

t-imamichi commented Jun 26, 2024

I reverted the C3X and C4X names. But due to the name conflict of C3X, C4X and MCX (all "mcx"), qasm2/test_export.py fails as follows (a random suffix is appended, e.g., mcx_4685682992). I don't know how to deal with it. Could you suggest a solution or take it over?

FAIL: test_mcx_gate (test.python.qasm2.test_export.TestQASM2Export)
test.python.qasm2.test_export.TestQASM2Export.test_mcx_gate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
testtools.testresult.real._StringException: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/ima/tasks/4_2024/qiskit/terra/test/python/qasm2/test_export.py", line 396, in test_mcx_gate
    self.assertEqual(qasm2.dumps(qc), expected_qasm)
  File "/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.10/3.10.14/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.10/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 845, in assertEqual
    assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg)
  File "/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.10/3.10.14/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.10/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 1226, in assertMultiLineEqual
    self.fail(self._formatMessage(msg, standardMsg))
  File "/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.10/3.10.14/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.10/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 675, in fail
    raise self.failureException(msg)
AssertionError: 'OPEN[394 chars]; }\ngate mcx_4685682992 q0,q1,q2,q3 { mcx q0,[56 chars][3];' != 'OPEN[394 chars]; }\nqreg q[4];\nmcx q[0],q[1],q[2],q[3];'
  OPENQASM 2.0;
  include "qelib1.inc";
  gate mcx q0,q1,q2,q3 { h q3; p(pi/8) q0; p(pi/8) q1; p(pi/8) q2; p(pi/8) q3; cx q0,q1; p(-pi/8) q1; cx q0,q1; cx q1,q2; p(-pi/8) q2; cx q0,q2; p(pi/8) q2; cx q1,q2; p(-pi/8) q2; cx q0,q2; cx q2,q3; p(-pi/8) q3; cx q1,q3; p(pi/8) q3; cx q2,q3; p(-pi/8) q3; cx q0,q3; p(pi/8) q3; cx q2,q3; p(-pi/8) q3; cx q1,q3; p(pi/8) q3; cx q2,q3; p(-pi/8) q3; cx q0,q3; h q3; }
- gate mcx_4685682992 q0,q1,q2,q3 { mcx q0,q1,q2,q3; }
  qreg q[4];
- mcx_4685682992 q[0],q[1],q[2],q[3];?    -----------
+ mcx q[0],q[1],q[2],q[3];

It might be a solution to update MCXGrayCode to replace MCU1 with MCP, but it might be another breaking change.

use regex to fetch the mcx_<random id> name
@Cryoris
Copy link
Contributor

Cryoris commented Jun 26, 2024

Hi @t-imamichi, I pushed a small fix for the qasm tests using regex to match the randomized gate ID, hopefully everything passes now 🙂

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 26, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9676110521

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • 5 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.03%) to 89.747%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
crates/qasm2/src/lex.rs 5 91.86%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9661630219: 0.03%
Covered Lines: 63769
Relevant Lines: 71054

💛 - Coveralls

@ShellyGarion
Copy link
Member

Hi @t-imamichi, I pushed a small fix for the qasm tests using regex to match the randomized gate ID, hopefully everything passes now 🙂

thanks! this looks good, the tests are OK now, only some lint errors (line too long)

@t-imamichi t-imamichi marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2024 02:35
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for your supports, @ShellyGarion and @Cryoris. I fixed the lint errors and added reno.
Could you review it?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 27, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9689789453

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • 5 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.002%) to 89.782%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
qiskit/transpiler/passes/synthesis/unitary_synthesis.py 2 88.2%
crates/qasm2/src/lex.rs 3 92.88%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9683280067: -0.002%
Covered Lines: 63814
Relevant Lines: 71077

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@ShellyGarion ShellyGarion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your efforts!

@Cryoris Cryoris added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 27, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 27, 2024
@mtreinish mtreinish added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 27, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2024
* enable the new efficient MCX decompose

* fix tests

* revert explicit

* apply review comments

* update test_circuit_qasm.py

* update test_decompose.py

* revert C3X C4X names

* fix qasm2 exporter tests

use regex to fetch the mcx_<random id> name

* fix lint and add reno

---------

Co-authored-by: Julien Gacon <jules.gacon@googlemail.com>
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 27, 2024
@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

Something may go wrong around qpy compatibility. But I have no idea what to do.

@ShellyGarion ShellyGarion added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into Qiskit:main with commit 76af5b4 Jun 27, 2024
15 checks passed
@ShellyGarion
Copy link
Member

Something may go wrong around qpy compatibility. But I have no idea what to do.

merged!

@t-imamichi t-imamichi deleted the mcx branch June 28, 2024 02:34
@t-imamichi
Copy link
Member Author

thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog mod: circuit Related to the core of the `QuantumCircuit` class or the circuit library performance synthesis
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants