Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
211 lines (108 loc) · 10.2 KB

community-review-of-the-f10-catalyst-fund-operations-proposal.md

File metadata and controls

211 lines (108 loc) · 10.2 KB
description
Saturday Swarm Session on July 22th about the "Catalyst Fund Operations by IOG Catalyst Team" Fund 10 Proposal

Community Review of the F10 Catalyst Fund Operations proposal

{% embed url="https://youtu.be/T3xT4WOA0QM" %}

Overview

Saturday Swarm Session on July 22th about the "Catalyst Fund Operations by IOG Catalyst Team" Fund 10 Proposal.

{% embed url="https://cardano.ideascale.com/c/idea/107493/" %}

Was a spicy discussion. More insights added soon from our friends at QA-DAO & Governance Guild

Issue Board

Issue Board for this proposal - https://github.com/orgs/Quality-Assur...

Timestamps

Introduction to Swarm Sessions - Felix - 00:00

Presentation

PRESENTATION - Stephen - 02:35

Welcome to the Community Review of F10 Catalyst Fund Operations - 03:00

Contents Slide - 03:14

Catalyst Fund Operations Challenge - 03:27

Challenge Questions / Importance of Challenge / Awarding Information - 04:02

Overview of the F10 "Catalyst Fund Operations by IOG Catalyst Team" proposal - 04:35

Preliminary details - 04:40

(Submission date, Problem & Solution Statement, Dependencies)

Dependencies - 05:26

IMPACT

IMPACT - 06:08

What does IMPACT mean ? - 06:21

Proposed Solution - 06:36

(Mission, Intent & Scope, Goals, Stakeholders & Team)

Addressing the Challenge - 07:22

(Delivery commitments, track record of delivery, community collaboration & operational maintenance )

No specific reference to ""a community review" ? - 08:19

Measuring Success - 08:54

(Processing 1,200 funded proposals, collating & publishing data points)

Outputs & results - 10:04

(Newsletters, technical updates, Town Halls and an Annual Impact & Evaluation Report)

CAPABILITY & FEASIBILITY

Trust & Accountability - 10:28

(Legal clarity, Catalyst Funding Vehicle, Milestone proofs & service level agreement. )

Main Goals - 11:16

(1) Operate 3 funds, 2) maintain voting infrastructure, 3) maintain proof of achievement, 4) initiate education, 5) deliver reports & 6) transparency)

Milestones - 11:45

Milestone Outputs & Outcomes - 12:50

RESOURCES & VALUE FOR MONEY

Budget Breakdown - 13:03

Value for Information -- 14:02

How to give feedback - 14:10

Thank You - 14:32

Community Discussion

COMMUNITY DISCUSSION - 14:50

ROUND 1

Entry to a member based organization ? Double Dipping ? - Joey - 15:07

Transparency - Joey - 16:01

Who is involved in IOG Catalyst Team ? - How to transition to community control ? - Joey - 17:30

Where is the oversight ? - Vanessa - 18:49

Who is measuring milestones ? - Vanessa - 19:25

Defense of Catalyst - Stephen - 19:44

(Separation of operation from fund vehicle to enable future transition)

ROUND 2

How will operational overhead be reduced ? - 21:33 - Eystein

Budget discrepancies - 22:24 - Eystein

Collaboration opportunities - 22:41 - Eystein

What happens if not funded ? - Financial dependencies - Joey - 23:16

Proposal strategy - Challenge setting and sharing - Innovation fund handover - Tevo - 25:18

Silence on proposal - Catalyst as role model - no response to comments - late submission - Felix - 28:10

Defense of Catalyst - Stephen - 32:40

How to reduce budget overhead ? - 32:48

1 year cadence for stability ? - 33:18

Not Funded ? - 33:40

IOG mission to decentralize - 34:02

Spirit of the Challenge - 34:30

Lack of IOG capacity ? - 34:55

The cost of running a fund - 35:30

ROUND 3

Good plan, bad execution - Eystein - 36:04

1 year cadence breaks competition - Eystein - 36:20

Nordic community treasury - Eystein - 36:35

High threshold of entry - monopoly - Eystein - 36:51

Opportunities for co-production missed ? - Vanessa - 37:42

What does decentralization mean to IOG ? - Joey - 40:05

Competitive tendering- Joey - 40:56

Note : Cardano Foundation not involved in Catalyst - Felix - 42:50

No knowledge of Catalyst Parameters - Felix - 43:13 (Community used to legitimatize premade decisions) What can replace Catalyst Team after 1 year ? - Felix - 44:05

Rhetorical Challenge - Felix - 44:35 How do the outcomes of proposal relate to decentralization ? - Felix - 45:17

Defense of Catalyst - Stephen - 45:40

Lack of competition - 45:58

(IOG's commitment to structural change) Legal clarity addresses uncertainty around ADA ? - 46:42

Lack of co-production is missed opportunity - 46:52

(Path to competition eased by co-production) Commitment to educating the community in operations ? - 47:07

Lack of strategy for shift to decentralization ? - 47:36

Commitment to community review of milestones ? - 47:58

ROUND 4

Goal 4 - Education programme - Felix - 48:23

Scope does not allow transition - Eystein - 49:43

Oversight of proposal - Eystein - 50:33

Proposal goals - Tevo - 51:00

Transparency - Joey - 55:14

Swarm & After Town Hall - 56:57

Defense of Catalyst - Stephen - 1:00:00

The Challenge addresses 1 operational project - 1:00:12

Limited resources of IOG Catalyst Team - 1:00:58

Community competency & trust - 1:02:09

Self referential rubrics - Vanessa - 1:03:00

Return on intention - Measuring impact - 1:03:47

Clarity on community contributions & Innovation - Eystein - 1:05:12

Next steps

Next steps - Felix - 1:06:51