Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make FunOwl available as a plugin #1017

Closed
nicholascar opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Make FunOwl available as a plugin #1017

nicholascar opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@nicholascar
Copy link
Member

An OWL2 Functional Style Syntax parser/reader, based on RDFlib, is available: FunOwl. I propose this becomes a parser/serializer plugin for RDFlib, just as JSON-LD is now.

I don't think it should be a core (included) parser/serializer since it deals with OWL, not just RDF, but it would be great to have it available with nice RDFlib integration.

@nicholascar nicholascar added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 20, 2020
@nicholascar nicholascar added this to the rdflib 6.0.0 milestone Apr 20, 2020
@hsolbrig
Copy link
Contributor

Agree. How to proceed?

@nicholascar
Copy link
Member Author

nicholascar commented Apr 20, 2020

I had to create an Issue for this so I could raise it in the 6.0.0 Planning Meeting and have it listed in the Milestone 6.0.0.

If you'd like to join the planning meeting to champion this one, great! If you can't make it, no worries, I can just state that this is a proposed work item and we have a champion for it.

The only potentially related plannign item is discussion around "Creating a stable core, with many satellite plugins", as per the meeting agenda, but I think this will be a plugin, like JSON-LD so a satellite, so perhaps nothing will change there.

@hsolbrig
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to join the meeting -- where can I find the details?

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 25, 2021
@ghost ghost converted this issue into discussion #1551 Dec 25, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants