Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #12942 from kaspar030/xtimer_bench_listop
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
tests/bench_xtimer: initial import
  • Loading branch information
MichelRottleuthner committed Jan 8, 2020
2 parents ff285cb + d89debd commit 4fb8de5
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 464 additions and 0 deletions.
76 changes: 76 additions & 0 deletions tests/bench_xtimer/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
include ../Makefile.tests_common

USEMODULE += xtimer

# this test uses 1000 timers by default. for boards that boards don't have
# enough memory, reduce that to 100 or 20, unless NUMOF_TIMERS has been overridden.
LOW_MEMORY_BOARDS += \
airfy-beacon \
arduino-mega2560 \
b-l072z-lrwan1 \
blackpill \
blackpill-128kib \
bluepill \
bluepill-128kib \
calliope-mini \
cc1352-launchpad \
cc2650-launchpad \
cc2650stk \
chronos \
hifive1 \
hifive1b \
i-nucleo-lrwan1 \
lsn50 \
maple-mini \
microbit \
msb-430 \
msb-430h \
nrf51dongle \
nrf6310 \
nucleo-f030r8 \
nucleo-f042k6 \
nucleo-f070rb \
nucleo-f072rb \
nucleo-f103rb \
nucleo-f303k8 \
nucleo-f334r8 \
nucleo-l031k6 \
nucleo-l053r8 \
nucleo-l073rz \
opencm904 \
saml10-xpro \
saml11-xpro \
spark-core \
stm32f0discovery \
stm32l0538-disco \
telosb \
waspmote-pro \
wsn430-v1_3b \
wsn430-v1_4 \
yunjia-nrf51822 \
z1 \
#

SUPER_LOW_MEMORY_BOARDS += \
arduino-duemilanove \
arduino-leonardo \
arduino-nano \
arduino-uno \
atmega328p \
nucleo-f031k6 \
stm32f030f4-demo \
#

ifneq (, $(filter $(BOARD), $(LOW_MEMORY_BOARDS)))
NUMOF_TIMERS ?= 100
endif

ifneq (, $(filter $(BOARD), $(SUPER_LOW_MEMORY_BOARDS)))
NUMOF_TIMERS ?= 20
endif

NUMOF_TIMERS ?= 1000

CFLAGS += -DNUMOF_TIMERS=$(NUMOF_TIMERS)

include $(RIOTBASE)/Makefile.include
77 changes: 77 additions & 0 deletions tests/bench_xtimer/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
# Introduction

This test executes some benchmarks for xtimer's set() / remove() / now()
operations.

# Details

This set of benchmarks measures xtimer's list operation efficiency.
Depending on the available memory, the individual benchmarks that are using
multiple timers are run with either 1000 (the default), 100 or 20 timers.
Each benchmark is repeated REPEAT times (default 1000).
As only the operations are benchmarked, it is asserted that no timer ever
actually triggers.

### set() one

This repeatedly sets one timer in an otherwise emtpy list.
All but the first iteration will cause xtimer to implicitly remove the timer
first.
All iterations will cause the underlying periph timer to be updated.

### remove() one

This repeatedly removes one timer from the list. In all but the first iteration,
this list will be empty.


### set() + remove() one

This repeatedly first sets, then removes one timer. The list is empty
before and after each iteration.
All iterations will cause the underlying periph timer to be updated.

### set() many increasing targets

This adds NUMOF timers with increasing target times. Each iteration will add a
timer at the end of xtimer's timer list.
Only the first iteration will cause the underlying periph timer to be updated.
After this test, the list is populated with NUMOF timers.

### re-set() first

This repatedly re-sets the first timer in the list (to the same target time).
All iterations will cause the underlying periph timer to be updated.

### re-set() middle

This repatedly re-sets the timer in the middle of the list (to the same target
time).

### re-set() last

This repatedly re-sets the last timer in the list (to the same target time).

### remove() + set() first, middle, last

Same as the previous three, but does a remove() before set().

### remove() many decreasing

This removes all timers from the list, starting with the last.

### xtimer_now()

This simply calls xtimer_now() in a loop.


# How to interpret results

The aim is to measure the time spent in xtimer's list operations.
Lower values are better.
The first/middle/last tests give an idea of the best case / average case /
worst case when running the operation with NUMOF timers.
Note that every set() on an already set timer will trigger an implicit remove(),
thus the timer list has to be iterated twice.
The tests that do a remove() before set() show whether xtimer correctly
identifies an unset timer.

0 comments on commit 4fb8de5

Please sign in to comment.