Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

WIP IPv6 refactoring #2003

Closed
wants to merge 41 commits into from
Closed

WIP IPv6 refactoring #2003

wants to merge 41 commits into from

Conversation

miri64
Copy link
Member

@miri64 miri64 commented Nov 12, 2014

Changes so far:

  • reinclude net_if into IPv6 (ipv6_if) and KISSify ;-)
    • introduce loopback interface
  • introduce IPv6 address module (ipv6_addr)

    most modules that want to use something from IPv6 (the above mentioned ipv6_if e.g. just want to do something with IPv6 addresses so this was overdue IMHO)

Still WIP

Depends on #1680 and #1968.

@miri64 miri64 added State: waiting for other PR State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first State: WIP State: The PR is still work-in-progress and its code is not in its final presentable form yet Area: network Area: Networking Process: API change Integration Process: PR contains or issue proposes an API change. Should be handled with care. Impact: major The PR changes a significant part of the code base. It should be reviewed carefully labels Nov 12, 2014
@miri64 miri64 added this to the Release NEXT MAJOR milestone Nov 12, 2014
@miri64 miri64 mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2014
Merged
@miri64 miri64 force-pushed the ipv6-refactor branch 2 times, most recently from 4776a3e to 80432d0 Compare November 14, 2014 07:25
@miri64 miri64 mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2014
Merged
@miri64
Copy link
Member Author

miri64 commented Nov 18, 2014

Squashed WIP commits and rebased to current #1680

@miri64 miri64 force-pushed the ipv6-refactor branch 3 times, most recently from bdeee5d to 329cc74 Compare November 21, 2014 12:47
@miri64
Copy link
Member Author

miri64 commented Nov 21, 2014

Rebased to #1680

@miri64 miri64 modified the milestones: Release NEXT MAJOR, Release 2014.12 Dec 6, 2014
@miri64 miri64 mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2015
Closed
36 tasks
@OlegHahm OlegHahm modified the milestones: Release NEXT MAJOR, Network Stack Task Force Feb 6, 2015
@OlegHahm OlegHahm added NSTF and removed NSTF labels Feb 6, 2015
@miri64 miri64 modified the milestone: Network Stack Task Force Feb 8, 2015
@miri64 miri64 mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2015
Closed
@miri64
Copy link
Member Author

miri64 commented Feb 8, 2015

As of tomorrow there will be heavy changes to this PR.

@miri64 miri64 added the State: archived State: The PR has been archived for possible future re-adaptation label Feb 8, 2015
@miri64 miri64 closed this Feb 8, 2015
@miri64 miri64 deleted the ipv6-refactor branch February 8, 2015 14:11
@miri64 miri64 restored the ipv6-refactor branch February 8, 2015 14:11
@miri64 miri64 reopened this Feb 8, 2015
@miri64
Copy link
Member Author

miri64 commented Feb 8, 2015

By browser is stupid … or me ^^

@miri64
Copy link
Member Author

miri64 commented Feb 13, 2015

Abandoned in favor for #2454.

@miri64 miri64 closed this Feb 13, 2015
@miri64 miri64 deleted the ipv6-refactor branch March 9, 2015 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@OlegHahm OlegHahm

Labels
Area: network Area: Networking Impact: major The PR changes a significant part of the code base. It should be reviewed carefully Process: API change Integration Process: PR contains or issue proposes an API change. Should be handled with care. State: archived State: The PR has been archived for possible future re-adaptation State: waiting for other PR State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first State: WIP State: The PR is still work-in-progress and its code is not in its final presentable form yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@miri64 @OlegHahm