Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

sys/newlib: Fix function definitions to match newlib prototypes #5214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2016
Merged

sys/newlib: Fix function definitions to match newlib prototypes #5214

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2016

Conversation

jnohlgard
Copy link
Member

@jnohlgard jnohlgard added Type: bug The issue reports a bug / The PR fixes a bug (including spelling errors) Platform: ARM Platform: This PR/issue effects ARM-based platforms Impact: minor The PR is small in size and might only require a quick look of a knowledgeable reviewer labels Mar 31, 2016
@jnohlgard jnohlgard added this to the Release 2016.04 milestone Mar 31, 2016
@OlegHahm OlegHahm added the CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR label Mar 31, 2016
@OlegHahm
Copy link
Member

Seems sensible, let's see what Murdock says.

@OlegHahm
Copy link
Member

Murdock agrees. ACK and go!

@OlegHahm OlegHahm merged commit d699ff1 into RIOT-OS:master Mar 31, 2016
@jnohlgard jnohlgard deleted the pr/newlib-prototype-fixes branch June 23, 2016 07:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@OlegHahm OlegHahm

Labels
CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR Impact: minor The PR is small in size and might only require a quick look of a knowledgeable reviewer Platform: ARM Platform: This PR/issue effects ARM-based platforms Type: bug The issue reports a bug / The PR fixes a bug (including spelling errors)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release 2016.04
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@jnohlgard @OlegHahm