core: documentation: updated, improved, and completed doxygen comments #983
Conversation
|
For |
| * @def BS_COND | ||
| * @brief Conditional setting of a bitmask | ||
| * | ||
| * @param[in] condition The condition to be checked |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But the condition is also bitwise, isn't it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually I'm not 100% sure, but probably yes. I would still vote for removing these two macros.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What I don't understand is the -
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've got the feeling it maybe should be ~, because two-compliment does not make any sense here, while one-compliment makes at least a little bit sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Another reason to delete the macro. Maybe be made sense once, but since then we forgot the meaning ...
|
Replace “task“ with “thread“ in sched.h:42 and sched.h:66? |
|
Thanks for the comments. Updated. |
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| /* | |||
| * Copyright (C) 2013 Freie Universität Berlin | |||
| * Copyright (C) 2014 Freie Universität Berlin | |||
| * | |||
| * This file subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU Lesser General | |||
|
sched.h |
|
Updated. |
|
ACK. |
|
ACK, go when squashed |
|
Squashed. |
core: documentation: updated, improved, and completed doxygen comments
Closes #948