Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a consumer, I would like to know if a school is considered a less-than-2-year school so that I can tell the difference between predominantly certificate and associate degree schools #1396

Closed
brian9 opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 23 comments

Comments

@brian9
Copy link

brian9 commented Dec 7, 2015

When we go to a school's page, and it has 2 or 4 year icon, how will we represent that if it is a predominantly certificate school?

Related to issues #951 and #952

@LisaGee
Copy link
Contributor

LisaGee commented Dec 10, 2015

@brian9 We have an icon for a Certificate school.
But I guess maybe we should think about what this icon actually tells a student about a school to see what makes the most sense.

@barkimedes
Copy link
Contributor

@jjoteal What should we do here? If a school is PREDDEG=1 (predominantly certificate), what should show up on that school's page as its designation (currently only do 2 year or 4 year)?

FYI, in js/src/picc.js is the code that determines the year designation:

picc.access.yearDesignation = function(d) {
  var degree = picc.access(picc.fields.PREDOMINANT_DEGREE)(d);
  switch (+degree) {
    case 2: // 2-year (AKA less than 4-year)
      return 'lt_four_year';
    case 3: // 4-year
      return 'four_year';
  }
  return null;
};

Based on this, the behavior (if we change nothing) will be some sort of bug because some school will have PREDDEG=1.

@claremccann
Copy link

The policy team is also discussing and will circle back.

@jjoteal
Copy link
Contributor

jjoteal commented Dec 10, 2015

@barkimedes -- we have an icon for certificate programs already (just not currently in-use). Looks like this:
image

Will ensure that the .svg is in Drive > PICC > Designs > Consumer Tool > Assets for the front-end devs.

@barkimedes
Copy link
Contributor

Per conversation with @mitzkow, we will default to showing the 2 year logo for certificate schools for now with the understanding that we can change this later if necessary.

Will leave the issue open because I think we still have the open question of what should we do in general here and this resolution only gets us through adding certificate schools and having something there.

@barkimedes
Copy link
Contributor

As we discussed last week, instead we will have predominantly certificate schools show <2 years rather than the current certificate icon.

@jjoteal Do you have an ETA on when the new <2 year asset will be available (or if it is already)?

@jjoteal
Copy link
Contributor

jjoteal commented Dec 23, 2015

Yes, here is the new icon:

image

I am thinking that this format will be consistent with the other icons and accordingly won't make it look more "special" than the others. Let me know if this will work or if you think I should explore other options.

@LisaGee
Copy link
Contributor

LisaGee commented Dec 28, 2015

Out of curiosity, why <2 vs. Certificate icon?

@LisaGee
Copy link
Contributor

LisaGee commented Dec 28, 2015

Okay by me. Thanks, Jess..

@jjoteal
Copy link
Contributor

jjoteal commented Dec 28, 2015

RE: Why not the certificate?
The Dept. of Ed had concerns that the certificate icon, since it was a graphic, made it feel more "special" than the 2-year and 4-year icon, so we opted for the <2-year icon to keep things in a consistent, uniform format.

@LisaGee
Copy link
Contributor

LisaGee commented Dec 28, 2015

Thanks. Do we know how students think of schools? Would they call a school a “less than 2 year” school? Or would they have some other way of describing it? Do you know? Want to make sure we’re using vocabulary that will mean something to our audience. Thanks..

@jjoteal
Copy link
Contributor

jjoteal commented Dec 28, 2015

We can definitely test this in upcoming usability test sessions, but my gut would say that the average high school student would NOT know what "< 2 years" or "certificate" means. I think terms like "bachelors" and "associates" and "professional certificate" or "license" might be more familiar. That said, I'm not sure what "< 2 years" all includes.... could we get a list of what specific degrees those would be?

@claremccann
Copy link

Jess and/or Lisa, why don't you call me tomorrow to discuss further?

@barkimedes
Copy link
Contributor

Necessary for #951, #952, #953, #954, #955.

@LisaGee
Copy link
Contributor

LisaGee commented Dec 29, 2015

Thanks, Clare. Jess is on leave until Jan. 7th, so she’ll catch up with you then.

@barkimedes
Copy link
Contributor

@abisker: we will get a final asset from @jjoteal, but up until that point, does it make sense to have someone update the logic around using the new asset? Then when we get the final one, we can just plop in the replacement.

For now, let's use the latest <2 year asset that was added to this issue as the placeholder.

@jjoteal
Copy link
Contributor

jjoteal commented Jan 11, 2016

Hi folks,

Per various discussions, we will be testing this solution (along with the 4, 2, and <2 icons) on Wednesday during our focus group with DC-CAP:

image

Test Against:
image

@jjoteal
Copy link
Contributor

jjoteal commented Jan 15, 2016

Based on usability testing and Ed's concerns, we have 2 options for the final "icon" for certificate schools. @LisaGee could you make the final call between these 2:

image

---- OR -----

image

@barkimedes
Copy link
Contributor

Personally, I prefer the first one. I know the second one feels more consistent when they're next to each other, but I feel like it would look weird on the page since it is by itself (not next to the others).

@abisker
Copy link
Contributor

abisker commented Jan 15, 2016

After speaking with @barkimedes we're going to go with the first one (using only the full word certificate); @yozlet, @ultrasaurus, @shawnbot -- ready to move forward here.

@barkimedes
Copy link
Contributor

@shawnbot, @jjoteal gave the OK in the PR. Methinks we're good to go here. Thanks!!

@shawnbot
Copy link
Contributor

Great, moving to accept!

@barkimedes
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome 🇺🇸

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants