Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please fix Manual Import to match as good as Bulk Import Movies matches #3855

Closed
douglas24 opened this issue Nov 3, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels
Status: Info Needed Issue does not follow the template or is missing information from the template such as logs Type: Feature Request Issue is a feature request.

Comments

@douglas24
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When I have a bunch of movies that I want to add to my existing library, I will use Bulk Import Movies and nearly all get a match and added. I then edit my library so that the newly added movies have the same location as my current library (instead of split between two different library folders). I then use Manual Import to import those new movies so radarr moves/renames them into the current library location.

Describe the solution you'd like
When using Manual Import, a lot of the movies (30-40%) fail to find a match despite having been matched successfully with Bulk Import Movies. I'm not sure why one works better at matching than the other, but could Manual Import be fixed so that it works the same as/as well as whatever mechanism is used for Bulk Import Movies?

Describe alternatives you've considered
I don't know of any alternative besides letting Manual Import continue to function worse than how Bulk Import Movies works for matching.

Additional context
A quick fix to Manual Import would be to make it use the same matching mechanics that Bulk Import Movies uses. I'm really not sure why Manual Import is less successful at matching movies to existing movies/names in the library.

@issue-label-bot
Copy link

Issue-Label Bot is automatically applying the label feature_request to this issue, with a confidence of 0.89. Please mark this comment with 👍 or 👎 to give our bot feedback!

Links: app homepage, dashboard and code for this bot.

@Qstick
Copy link
Member

Qstick commented Dec 8, 2019

Need specific examples, logs, and version info

@Qstick Qstick added the Status: Info Needed Issue does not follow the template or is missing information from the template such as logs label Dec 8, 2019
@Qstick Qstick added Type: Feature Request Issue is a feature request. and removed feature_request labels Jan 7, 2020
@Qstick
Copy link
Member

Qstick commented Jun 24, 2020

Closing for lack of info

@Qstick Qstick closed this as completed Jun 24, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Status: Info Needed Issue does not follow the template or is missing information from the template such as logs Type: Feature Request Issue is a feature request.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants