Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Raptoreum Profitability Seems to be Off #1814

Closed
jch9678 opened this issue Nov 10, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed

Raptoreum Profitability Seems to be Off #1814

jch9678 opened this issue Nov 10, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
pool issue solved An issue has been solved

Comments

@jch9678
Copy link

jch9678 commented Nov 10, 2021

According to this https://mineraptoreum.com/ a hashrate of 2038 h/s should yield about $2.27 per day. RM shows profitability for the same speed at $0.002

Also could you add this miner for Raptoreum please

https://github.com/WyvernTKC/cpuminer-gr-avx2/releases

@RainbowMiner RainbowMiner self-assigned this Nov 11, 2021
@RainbowMiner
Copy link
Owner

Which pool causes that trouble? Is it RPlant?

@jch9678
Copy link
Author

jch9678 commented Nov 11, 2021

It's zpoolcoins

RainbowMiner added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2021
- fix profit calculation (issue #1814)
@RainbowMiner RainbowMiner added the solved An issue has been solved label Nov 12, 2021
@RainbowMiner
Copy link
Owner

It's fixed - the profit calculation for ZpoolCoins has been wrong.

@jch9678
Copy link
Author

jch9678 commented Nov 12, 2021

Thanks

@jch9678
Copy link
Author

jch9678 commented Nov 12, 2021

What do you think about that miner? It may be tough to implement because there are different binaries depending on your cpu.

@PapaChealio
Copy link

jch9678: "It may be tough to implement..."
RainbowMiner: "Hold my beer."

=)

@jch9678
Copy link
Author

jch9678 commented Nov 15, 2021

Hahaha.
A quick and dirty way would be to treat each binary as a different miner and benchmark them all. A little more complicated would be too benchmark the miner with the most instructions set, then if it fails, fall back to the next miner with less instructions set, and so on.

@RainbowMiner
Copy link
Owner

jch9678: "It may be tough to implement..."
RainbowMiner: "Hold my beer."

That nails it pretty accurate =)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pool issue solved An issue has been solved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants