Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Teamblack wrong option passed in argument #2716

Open
jeromemorignot opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Teamblack wrong option passed in argument #2716

jeromemorignot opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
miner issue Some miner is not behaving, like it should

Comments

@jeromemorignot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

The recent release triggered a benchmarking of Teamblack, but they all failed, looking at the logs it complains about the argument:
Illegal option detected:
...

Then looking at the command used I could see the wrong argument is the --lhr-unlock option:
TBMiner.exe --algo kawpow --hostname kawpow.mine.zergpool.com --port 3638 --wallet XXXXXX--worker-name spaceheater2 --server-passwd c=DOGE,mc=NEOX,ID=spaceheater2,refcode=newminerbonus --cuda-devices [0,1,2,3,4,5] --lhr-unlock [0,0,0,0,0,0] --api --api-port 36501

This option doesn't appear to be available in the latest Teamblack release.

@RainbowMiner RainbowMiner self-assigned this Mar 19, 2024
@RainbowMiner
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for the report! I will remove that parameter asap.

@RainbowMiner RainbowMiner added the miner issue Some miner is not behaving, like it should label Mar 19, 2024
RainbowMiner added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2024
- fix removed lhr-unlock parameter (issue #2716)
@realsetvin
Copy link

I believe a similar issue is affecting CpuminerRplant-CPU

I did a fresh install and benchmark with a 3600x on 3800 core 1.0 volt - and it appears almost all (if not all) of the cpu options for CpuminerRplant failed to benchmark.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
miner issue Some miner is not behaving, like it should
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants