Issue 3706 #3722
Merged
Issue 3706 #3722
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Code example now works using TWEAK instead of BUILD. Changes description to mentions TWEAK instead of BUILD too.
There is no reason in this example to show a private attribute. This clarifies that TWEAK can use $! to access attributes and that it's not a typo, without going into an explanation at this stage.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The problem
OO code example in rb-nutshell doesn't work #3706
Code snippet example "is bogus code in several ways, generating warnings, failing to initialize the object, etc."
Solution provided
The snippet uses BUILD to access properties at instantiation, but they don't yet exist. TWEAK must be used as it runs after the properties are set.
For clarity, have removed private attributes from this example as they are not referred to.