Shall we suggest Foo::Bar::X::What::Happened exception name format?

[bbkr]

https://docs.perl6.org/type/Exception

There was discussion on IRC how exceptions should be defined in _user modules_.
Current documentation suggests X::Foo::Bar::What::Happened but Foo::Bar::X::What::Happened is better because:

• It is clear which part is the name of package and which is the name of exception. Let's take old X::User::Access::Auth::Invalid for example - did we have problem with accessing authorization system from User class or did we simply get wrong credentials in User::Access class? Defining this as User::Access::X::Auth::Invalid makes things explicit - we have separate class for user access and it got wrong credentials.
• It is lexically scoped - exception What::Happened can be defined in Foo::Bar class and exported.
• When ecosystem will grow we will encounter many conflicts in X:: namespace. For example people will be defining exceptions like X::ParamMissing and use them in Foo::Bar class. Exception should be encapsulated. I know that there is :auth to distinguish package origin but it won't solve the problem.

So what is your opinion? Shall we promote in docs Foo::Bar::X::What::Happened format (and create issues in modules that use X:: format to refactor them while ecosystem is still young) ?

[quietfanatic]

I agree with this and all its rationales. Things defined by a module should all be in that module's namespace.

[AlexDaniel]

I didn't know this ticket existed, so I filed another one: #11 Raku/problem-solving#57

This repo will likely be unified with problem-solving in the future, so I'm closing this ticket in favor of the other one.

[vrurg]

I think you meant Raku/problem-solving#57

[AlexDaniel]

Ah, yes! Thank you!