Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support all message types in sdk (quick replies) #83

Closed
erohmensing opened this issue May 29, 2019 · 14 comments
Closed

support all message types in sdk (quick replies) #83

erohmensing opened this issue May 29, 2019 · 14 comments
Labels
area:rasa-sdk 🧑‍💻 Everything that touches our python Rasa SDK stale type:discussion 👨‍👧‍👦 Early stage of an idea or validation of thoughts. Should NOT be closed by PR. type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR

Comments

@erohmensing
Copy link
Contributor

erohmensing commented May 29, 2019

alternatively we could deprecate support for quick replies and only keep the very general stuff supported in templates, with channel-specifc (e.g. quick replies) stuff delegated to custom json payloads.

@erohmensing erohmensing added the type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR label May 29, 2019
@wochinge wochinge added the area:rasa-sdk 🧑‍💻 Everything that touches our python Rasa SDK label Nov 18, 2019
@cowjen01
Copy link
Contributor

cowjen01 commented Jan 29, 2020

@erohmensing @wochinge Hello, we are currently replacing all deprecated utter methods and custom json payloads by utter_message across our projects so they could be easily tested with Rasa Shell. But we really miss an option to send both buttons and quick replies via utter_message method. Quick replies are now supported across all channels and they can even be send from domain.yml templates. I suggest to add quick_replies argument to the method's constructor so the SDK will not be only limitation to fully use all components via Rasa Shell utility. We are ready to make the work done ASAP.

@cowjen01
Copy link
Contributor

cowjen01 commented Feb 4, 2020

@erohmensing Any updates about this issue? We would like to start working on it once we get a permission.

@erohmensing
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cowjen01 that would be great! Let me know if you need any help with it.

@erohmensing erohmensing added this to 🚀Doing in Contribute to Rasa Feb 5, 2020
@zesherk zesherk added the type:discussion 👨‍👧‍👦 Early stage of an idea or validation of thoughts. Should NOT be closed by PR. label Mar 9, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 7, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 7, 2020
@wochinge wochinge removed the stale label Jun 8, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 6, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Sep 6, 2020
@wochinge wochinge removed the stale label Sep 7, 2020
@wochinge
Copy link
Contributor

wochinge commented Sep 7, 2020

How is it going with the issue @cowjen01 ?

@erohmensing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Unfortunately I think this issue should be closed, as we should move ahead with deprecating these: RasaHQ/rasa#5239

@cowjen01
Copy link
Contributor

@erohmensing I agree on this! We've stoped working on this issue due to RasaHQ/rasa#5239. Sorry I didn't let u know guys. My apologies!

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 19, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 19, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 26, 2020

This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity. Please create a new issue if you need more help.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Dec 26, 2020
Contribute to Rasa automation moved this from 🚀Doing to ✅Done Dec 26, 2020
@wochinge wochinge removed the stale label Jan 4, 2021
@wochinge wochinge reopened this Jan 4, 2021
Contribute to Rasa automation moved this from ✅Done to 💻Code - Open Issues Jan 4, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 11, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 11, 2021
@wochinge wochinge removed the stale label Jun 15, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 8, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jan 8, 2022
@wochinge wochinge removed the stale label Jan 10, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 16, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 16, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 28, 2022

This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity. Please create a new issue if you need more help.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Apr 28, 2022
Contribute to Rasa automation moved this from 💻Code - Open Issues to ✅Done Apr 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:rasa-sdk 🧑‍💻 Everything that touches our python Rasa SDK stale type:discussion 👨‍👧‍👦 Early stage of an idea or validation of thoughts. Should NOT be closed by PR. type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants