New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Slack init message #7368
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Slack init message #7368
Conversation
Thanks for submitting a pull request 🚀 @rgstephens will take a look at it as soon as possible ✨ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for your contribution. After thinking about it, I am not sure we should put the burden of figuring out if this really is an "init" on the user.
We already have the session_started
event that we emit if a new conversation is started which you can react to in a custom action and take things from there - I am not sure what different use case this would be used for, can you add some thoughts?
hi @tmbo - yes I m aware of that. But you are kind of proving my point by your reply.
Which current solution using The burden of having to figure out the "init" of the user is not that hard. Bottom line - this behavior is optional and this fact is clearly documented in changed doc files. |
@tmbo any updates on this? :D |
I agree that there is a use case for this and that it is earlier than what we currently call "SessionStarted". I do think that we need a more general approach to this though, that works across channels. I don't think using a special intent is the right approach for this for different reasons:
I think we should at least think about more generalisable/alternative approaches to support this use case, e.g.
|
@tmbo - I like your ideas - they make sense to me.
which of those 2 makes more sense from your point of view? I could understand both but maybe for the purpose of compatibility there could be a new event called sessioninitiated? Something like that? When I get some time I would look into it and try to implement this (I hope that I find the right place in code :P ) |
This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Proposed changes:
Status (please check what you already did):
black
(please check Readme for instructions)