-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Depositing ReScience articles in preprint archives #95
Comments
I agree we could do that. Note that we're also in the process of moving to JOSS infrastructure with proper referencing from Google Scholar. |
hey, @rougier -- what do you mean by "int he process of moving to JOSS infrastructure"? Are you cloning the whole tooling, and re-hosting under your own domain? Or is ReScience coming under The Open Journals umbrella? I believe only the latter will give you immediate Google Scholar indexing. We worked over a couple of years to get TheOJ recognized as a legit publisher by the Scholar team, with a bunch of tweaks needed under the hood for metatags and whatnot. Cloning the infra under your own domain, I think, means going back to square one for Google Scholar to index you. |
It is not yet clear actually. @karthik told us (ReScience/articles#11) he was in the process of generalizing JOSS and ReScience C might be part of the process. I guess we would go for the simplest option as long as we can keep the rescience.github.io domain. |
@rougier I wasn't that much thinking of Google Scholar, which is an issue we should tackle at the ReScience level. But preprint servers are gaining in popularity, and I see more and more scientists keeping an eye on their domain's dominant preprint server, so this is a good way for ReScience articles to get noticed. BTW, I am not proposing that we do the submissions (on some servers that would even be impossible). I am merely proposing that we point out to authors that this could be useful to do, and perhaps provide some kind of instructions if we think that could help. |
Yes, the reference to JOSS was merely a reminder about a possible future change in the submission process if we were to rewrite it. |
@ReScience/editors Following @broukema's experience (see ReScience/ten-years#2), should we add some recommendation about submission of articles to preprint archives to our instructions for authors? Depositing ReScience C papers elsewhere sounds like a good and cheap way to get more attention, both for the paper and for ReScience C.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: