docs(operators): write comprehensive JSDoc for expand() #1803

staltz · 2016-07-04T13:23:52Z

No description provided.

coveralls · 2016-07-04T13:29:05Z

Coverage remained the same at 96.472% when pulling e5c7ce3 on staltz:docs-expand into 2be221e on ReactiveX:master.

jayphelps · 2016-07-09T23:31:54Z

LGTM

coveralls · 2016-07-10T08:34:18Z

Coverage remained the same at 96.472% when pulling 65ce459 on staltz:docs-expand into 3632489 on ReactiveX:master.

staltz · 2016-07-10T08:45:24Z

Rebased

kwonoj · 2016-07-10T19:00:43Z

jayphelps · 2016-07-10T19:04:09Z

@staltz needs a rebase again, then ready for merge.

coveralls · 2016-07-10T20:15:47Z

Coverage remained the same at 96.472% when pulling 65ce459 on staltz:docs-expand into 3632489 on ReactiveX:master.

lock · 2018-06-06T22:41:31Z

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

jayphelps added PR: lgtm and removed PR: lgtm labels Jul 10, 2016

staltz force-pushed the docs-expand branch from e5c7ce3 to 65ce459 Compare July 10, 2016 08:29

staltz removed the PR: needs rebase label Jul 10, 2016

kwonoj added PR: needs rebase and removed PR: needs another LGTM labels Jul 10, 2016

docs(operators): write comprehensive JSDoc for expand()

6a21e0f

staltz force-pushed the docs-expand branch from 65ce459 to 6a21e0f Compare July 10, 2016 20:10

staltz removed the PR: needs rebase label Jul 10, 2016

kwonoj merged commit 19f4362 into ReactiveX:master Jul 10, 2016

lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2018

Provide feedback