Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(package.json): clear up intermidiate build artifact after build #2206

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 5, 2017

Conversation

kwonoj
Copy link
Member

@kwonoj kwonoj commented Dec 20, 2016

⚠️ Targeting master ⚠️

  • Non-breaking change

Description:
This PR makes force clear intermediate build artifact es6 used for internal doc / umd package building only, to no longer included in actual

Related issue (if exists):
#2177

@kwonoj
Copy link
Member Author

kwonoj commented Dec 20, 2016

I'm feeling bulid script might need to be simplified (and remove some of confusions if anyone read scripts).. but that's other story later.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 20, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.674% when pulling 077cc2e on kwonoj:fix-es6-build into dc06e01 on ReactiveX:master.

"build_perf": "webdriver-manager update && npm-run-all build_cjs build_global perf",
"build_test": "shx rm -rf ./dist/ && npm-run-all build_cjs clean_spec build_spec test_mocha",
"build_cover": "shx rm -rf ./dist/ && npm-run-all build_cjs build_spec cover",
"build_docs": "npm-run-all build_global build_es6_for_docs build_cjs clean_spec build_spec tests2png decision_tree_widget && esdoc -c esdoc.json",
"build_docs": "npm-run-all build_global build_es6_for_docs build_cjs clean_spec build_spec decision_tree_widget && esdoc -c esdoc.json && npm-run-all clean_dist_es6",
Copy link
Member

@jayphelps jayphelps Dec 20, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should tests2png have been kept? By removing it here, it's no longer used in any other script and I think it is indeed needed as part of the doc building process?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OH NO 😱 my bad, I was removing it to test script without png generation tools setup.

@kwonoj
Copy link
Member Author

kwonoj commented Dec 20, 2016

Updated PR corrects my error.

@jayphelps
Copy link
Member

Seems good, but I want @Blesh to confirm as well.

@kwonoj
Copy link
Member Author

kwonoj commented Dec 20, 2016

@jayphelps I agree.

@kwonoj kwonoj requested a review from benlesh December 20, 2016 22:15
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 20, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.674% when pulling 3a59884 on kwonoj:fix-es6-build into dc06e01 on ReactiveX:master.

@benlesh
Copy link
Member

benlesh commented Jan 5, 2017

LGTM

@benlesh benlesh merged commit 2a66087 into ReactiveX:master Jan 5, 2017
@kwonoj kwonoj deleted the fix-es6-build branch January 5, 2017 22:49
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 6, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants