Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ft.DELETE -> ft.DROPINDEX #1384

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2020
Merged

ft.DELETE -> ft.DROPINDEX #1384

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2020

Conversation

ashtul
Copy link
Contributor

@ashtul ashtul commented Jul 30, 2020

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #1384 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1384   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.73%   80.73%           
=======================================
  Files         144      144           
  Lines       19871    19871           
=======================================
  Hits        16043    16043           
  Misses       3828     3828
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/module.c 96.05% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c831d36...f3cd753. Read the comment docs.

@ashtul ashtul merged commit 03dbaac into master Jul 30, 2020
@ashtul ashtul deleted the ft.dropindex branch July 30, 2020 09:47
@emmanuelkeller emmanuelkeller added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Dec 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@MeirShpilraien MeirShpilraien MeirShpilraien approved these changes

@rafie rafie Awaiting requested review from rafie

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@ashtul @MeirShpilraien @emmanuelkeller