Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

centos8 #636

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Nov 17, 2021
Merged

centos8 #636

merged 6 commits into from Nov 17, 2021

Conversation

chayim
Copy link
Contributor

@chayim chayim commented Nov 16, 2021

No description provided.

@chayim chayim changed the base branch from master to 1.0 November 16, 2021 14:37
@chayim chayim changed the title ck centos8 1.0 centos8 Nov 16, 2021
Comment on lines 33 to +34
RUN ./deps/readies/bin/getpy2
RUN test -f /usr/bin/python || ln -s /usr/bin/python2 /usr/bin/python
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also possible: FIX=1 ./deps/readies/bin/getpy2

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're not merging this back to master. It's a cut-throat patch. Didn't know, thanks - will use next time!

@@ -117,7 +117,9 @@ OBJECTS=$(patsubst $(SRCDIR)/%.c,$(BINDIR)/%.o,$(SOURCES))
CC_DEPS = $(patsubst $(SRCDIR)/%.c, $(BINDIR)/%.d, $(SOURCES))

CC_FLAGS += \
-fPIC -std=gnu99 \
-fPIC \
-fcommon \
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO this is more risky than my change, but I'll go with it.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rafie can you explain why? What risks do you see with it?

@MeirShpilraien MeirShpilraien merged commit 9e046af into 1.0 Nov 17, 2021
@MeirShpilraien MeirShpilraien deleted the ck-centos8-1.0 branch November 17, 2021 14:27
@chayim chayim mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Race condition on message passing can cause execution to reach timeout
3 participants