Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

support TS.DEL #603

Closed
cwr31 opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

support TS.DEL #603

cwr31 opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists enhancement New feature or request
Projects
1.6

Comments

@cwr31
Copy link
Contributor

cwr31 commented Dec 15, 2020

Once a time series is stored, it's occupied memory is monotonically increasing because retention policy will not delete expired data.

TS.DEL key fromTs toTs
means safe delete the 'key' time series's data in fromTs-toTs time interval
@gkorland gkorland added enhancement New feature or request duplicate This issue or pull request already exists labels Dec 15, 2020
@gkorland
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate #264

@cwr31
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwr31 commented Dec 15, 2020 •
edited

Duplicate #264

Will expired data(use retention policy) be deleted and free memory. It could be another issue

@gkorland
Copy link
Contributor

data passed the retention time is deleted

@cwr31 cwr31 mentioned this issue Dec 23, 2020
Merged
@filipecosta90 filipecosta90 added this to To do in 1.6 via automation Apr 12, 2021
@gkorland gkorland moved this from To do to In progress in 1.6 May 24, 2021
@gkorland gkorland moved this from In progress to Review in progress in 1.6 May 24, 2021
@danni-m danni-m moved this from Review in progress to Done in 1.6 May 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists enhancement New feature or request
Projects
1.6
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gkorland @cwr31