-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Swift 4 #29
Support Swift 4 #29
Conversation
👍 looks like the right programming language |
Package.swift
Outdated
name: "LambdaKit", | ||
targets: ["LambdaKit"]), | ||
], | ||
dependencies: [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you should be able to omit this one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can't omit because the file structure is not following the conventional layout. See the "path" parameter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a new standard layout? Since this was the standard before I guess?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO we should make it whatever the standard is if we can reduce all this nonsense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lemme see what can be done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We shouldn't let this block our Swift 4 merge tho, so this is fine if this all works, but we should follow up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah not going to make this a hard dependency.
d9d5a8c
to
4dfc894
Compare
Reorganized files so they fit SPM convention. Updated Package.swift format for 4.0 era.
We have to update Package.swift format in order to get the generated pbxproj to have
4.0
as the value forSWIFT_VERSION
.