refactor: move ramstk_status to sub-package

[weibullguy]

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Describe the purpose of this pull request.

To move the common database tables to sub-packages under commondb.

Describe how this was implemented.

Created status sub-package. Moved ramstk_status.py to sub-package as record.py. Created table.py. Updated ramstk_status test suite and documentation.

Describe any particular area(s) reviewers should focus on.

None

Provide any other pertinent information.

Partially implements #846

Pull Request Checklist

• Code Style

  • Code is following code style guidelines.

• Static Checks

  • Failing static checks are only applicable to code outside the scope of
    this PR.

• Tests

  • At least one test for all newly created functions/methods?

• Chores

  • Issue(s) have been raised for problem areas outside the scope of
    this PR. These problem areas have been decorated with an ISSUE: # comment.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1004 (ffaf750) into master (7d3a9db) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1004      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.91%   94.92%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         180      182       +2     
  Lines        5312     5325      +13     
  Branches      506      507       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         5042     5055      +13     
  Misses        235      235              
  Partials       35       35              

Flag	Coverage Δ
3.6	94.92% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
3.7	94.92% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
3.8	94.92% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/ramstk/__main__.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/basemodel.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/status/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/status/record.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/status/table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7d3a9db...ffaf750. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 0.50%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	1.50 ⭐	1.55 ⭐	0.05 👎
Method Length	68.05 🙂	71.19 🙂	3.14 👎
Working memory	5.00 ⭐	5.04 ⭐	0.04 👎
Quality	79.72% ⭐	79.22% ⭐	-0.50% 👎

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	3343	3242	-101

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/ramstk/main.py	74.48% 🙂	74.48% 🙂	0.00%
src/ramstk/models/init.py	%	%	%
src/ramstk/models/basemodel.py	75.20% ⭐	75.20% ⭐	0.00%
src/ramstk/models/commondb/init.py	%	%	%
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	80.29% ⭐	80.29% ⭐	0.00%
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/desktop.py	82.27% ⭐	82.27% ⭐	0.00%
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/books/modulebook.py	89.74% ⭐	89.74% ⭐	0.00%
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/hazard_analysis/panel.py	81.44% ⭐	81.44% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	RAMSTKCommonDB.do_load_site_info	1 ⭐	360 ⛔	7 🙂	57.30% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
src/ramstk/models/basemodel.py	RAMSTKBaseTable.do_select_all	10 🙂	163 😞	7 🙂	58.51% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/hazard_analysis/panel.py	HazardsTreePanel.__init__	0 ⭐	1119 ⛔	6 ⭐	58.82% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
src/ramstk/models/basemodel.py	RAMSTKBaseTable.do_set_attributes.do_set_attributes_all.do_update	6 ⭐	180 😞	7 🙂	60.71% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/desktop.py	RAMSTKDesktop.__init__	2 ⭐	187 😞	8 🙂	61.71% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication