feature: use database triggers to add records on Hardware insert

[weibullguy]

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Describe the purpose of this pull request.

To use triggers to add new records to associated tables (design electric, design mechanic, mil-hdk-217f, nswc, and reliability) when a new record is added to the hardware table.

Describe how this was implemented.

Added triggers to database. Added methods to associated table to insert node in it's tree. Updated test suite and stub files.

Describe any particular area(s) reviewers should focus on.

None

Provide any other pertinent information.

Closes #985

Pull Request Checklist

• Code Style

  • Code is following code style guidelines.

• Static Checks

  • Failing static checks are only applicable to code outside the scope of
    this PR.

• Tests

  • At least one test for all newly created functions/methods?

• Chores

  • Issue(s) have been raised for problem areas outside the scope of
    this PR. These problem areas have been decorated with an ISSUE: # comment.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.16%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	0.23 ⭐	0.25 ⭐	0.02 👎
Method Length	55.46 ⭐	56.74 ⭐	1.28 👎
Working memory	4.85 ⭐	4.85 ⭐	0.00
Quality	81.14% ⭐	81.30% ⭐	0.16% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	9917	10469	552

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/ramstk/models/dbtables/programdb_allocation_table.py	81.88% ⭐	81.67% ⭐	-0.21% 👎
src/ramstk/models/dbtables/programdb_design_electric_table.py	95.76% ⭐	87.91% ⭐	-7.85% 👎
src/ramstk/models/dbtables/programdb_design_mechanic_table.py	95.76% ⭐	87.91% ⭐	-7.85% 👎
src/ramstk/models/dbtables/programdb_milhdbk217f_table.py	95.76% ⭐	87.91% ⭐	-7.85% 👎
src/ramstk/models/dbtables/programdb_nswc_table.py	95.76% ⭐	87.91% ⭐	-7.85% 👎
src/ramstk/models/dbtables/programdb_reliability_table.py	95.76% ⭐	88.64% ⭐	-7.12% 👎
src/ramstk/models/dbtables/programdb_similar_item_table.py	74.70% 🙂	75.11% ⭐	0.41% 👍
src/ramstk/models/dbviews/programdb_hardware_view.py	78.33% ⭐	78.64% ⭐	0.31% 👍
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/hardware/view.py	79.32% ⭐	80.78% ⭐	1.46% 👍
tests/conftest.py	80.24% ⭐	80.03% ⭐	-0.21% 👎
tests/models/programdb/allocation/allocation_integration_test.py	86.31% ⭐	85.98% ⭐	-0.33% 👎
tests/models/programdb/design_electric/design_electric_integration_test.py	85.42% ⭐	85.53% ⭐	0.11% 👍
tests/models/programdb/design_electric/design_electric_unit_test.py	77.04% ⭐	77.04% ⭐	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/design_mechanic/design_mechanic_integration_test.py	84.03% ⭐	84.43% ⭐	0.40% 👍
tests/models/programdb/design_mechanic/design_mechanic_unit_test.py	75.13% ⭐	75.13% ⭐	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/hardware/hardware_integration_test.py	71.08% 🙂	70.99% 🙂	-0.09% 👎
tests/models/programdb/milhdbk217f/milhdbk217f_integration_test.py	86.60% ⭐	86.71% ⭐	0.11% 👍
tests/models/programdb/milhdbk217f/milhdbk217f_unit_test.py	78.71% ⭐	78.71% ⭐	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/mission/mission_integration_test.py	92.44% ⭐	92.44% ⭐	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/mission_phase/mission_phase_integration_test.py	93.02% ⭐	93.02% ⭐	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/nswc/nswc_integration_test.py	83.88% ⭐	84.22% ⭐	0.34% 👍
tests/models/programdb/nswc/nswc_unit_test.py	74.31% 🙂	74.31% 🙂	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/reliability/reliability_integration_test.py	85.92% ⭐	85.97% ⭐	0.05% 👍
tests/models/programdb/reliability/reliability_unit_test.py	79.60% ⭐	79.60% ⭐	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/revision/revision_integration_test.py	92.09% ⭐	92.09% ⭐	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/similar_item/similar_item_integration_test.py	82.14% ⭐	82.03% ⭐	-0.11% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
tests/models/programdb/hardware/hardware_integration_test.py	TestAnalysisMethods.test_do_predict_hazard_rate_active_assembly_assessed	1 ⭐	338 ⛔	12 😞	47.52% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/models/programdb/hardware/hardware_integration_test.py	TestAnalysisMethods.test_do_calculate_hardware	0 ⭐	258 ⛔	12 😞	51.25% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/models/programdb/hardware/hardware_integration_test.py	TestSelectMethods.test_on_select_all_tree_loaded	0 ⭐	236 ⛔	11 😞	54.14% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/models/programdb/hardware/hardware_integration_test.py	TestSelectMethods.test_on_select_all	0 ⭐	222 ⛔	11 😞	54.98% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/models/programdb/hardware/hardware_integration_test.py	TestAnalysisMethods.test_do_calculate_power_dissipation_assembly	0 ⭐	140 😞	12 😞	60.38% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[sonarcloud]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
27.3% Duplication

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1026 (c498c9b) into master (b0cd45e) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1026      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.80%   94.85%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         144      144              
  Lines        5194     5247      +53     
  Branches      508      522      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits         4924     4977      +53     
  Misses        233      233              
  Partials       37       37              

Flag	Coverage Δ
3.6	94.85% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
3.7	94.85% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
3.8	94.85% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...c/ramstk/models/dbviews/programdb_hardware_view.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...mstk/models/dbtables/programdb_allocation_table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...models/dbtables/programdb_design_electric_table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...models/dbtables/programdb_design_mechanic_table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...stk/models/dbtables/programdb_milhdbk217f_table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/dbtables/programdb_nswc_table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...stk/models/dbtables/programdb_reliability_table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...tk/models/dbtables/programdb_similar_item_table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6d4bc77...c498c9b. Read the comment docs.