refactor: move ramstk_measurement to sub-package

[weibullguy]

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Describe the purpose of this pull request.

To move tables in common database to sub-packages under commondb.

Describe how this was implemented.

Created measurement sub-package. Moved ramstk_measurement.py to sub-package as record.py. Created table.py. Updated ramstk_measurement test suite.

Describe any particular area(s) reviewers should focus on.

None

Provide any other pertinent information.

Partially implements #846

Pull Request Checklist

• Code Style

  • Code is following code style guidelines.

• Static Checks

  • Failing static checks are only applicable to code outside the scope of
    this PR.

• Tests

  • At least one test for all newly created functions/methods?

• Chores

  • Problem areas outside the scope of this PR have an # ISSUE: comment
    decorating the code block. These # ISSUE: comments are automatically
    converted to issues on successful merge. Alternatively, you can manually
    raise an issue for each problem area you identify.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #997 (f20a43b) into master (d2139e9) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 78.37%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #997      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.91%   94.86%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         170      172       +2     
  Lines        5249     5260      +11     
  Branches      502      502              
==========================================
+ Hits         4982     4990       +8     
- Misses        232      235       +3     
  Partials       35       35              

Flag	Coverage Δ
3.6	?
3.7	94.86% <78.37%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
3.8	94.86% <78.37%> (-0.05%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/ramstk/__main__.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/ramstk/analyses/allocation.py	98.61% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/analyses/fha.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/analyses/statistics/bounds.py	64.70% <0.00%> (ø)
src/ramstk/exim/imports.py	87.23% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/db/base.py	84.39% <80.00%> (-2.32%)	⬇️
...rc/ramstk/analyses/milhdbk217f/models/capacitor.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 8 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d2139e9...f20a43b. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 0.41%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	2.16 ⭐	2.17 ⭐	0.01 👎
Method Length	80.76 🙂	82.54 🙂	1.78 👎
Working memory	5.68 ⭐	5.79 ⭐	0.11 👎
Quality	76.55% ⭐	76.14% ⭐	-0.41% 👎

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	9079	8995	-84

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/ramstk/main.py	75.40% ⭐	74.48% 🙂	-0.92% 👎
src/ramstk/analyses/allocation.py	77.08% ⭐	74.26% 🙂	-2.82% 👎
src/ramstk/analyses/fha.py	82.71% ⭐	82.44% ⭐	-0.27% 👎
src/ramstk/analyses/milhdbk217f/models/capacitor.py	74.06% 🙂	74.06% 🙂	0.00%
src/ramstk/analyses/milhdbk217f/models/inductor.py	74.17% 🙂	74.17% 🙂	0.00%
src/ramstk/analyses/milhdbk217f/models/resistor.py	67.44% 🙂	67.44% 🙂	0.00%
src/ramstk/analyses/milhdbk217f/models/semiconductor.py	71.58% 🙂	71.58% 🙂	0.00%
src/ramstk/analyses/statistics/bounds.py	75.52% ⭐	75.52% ⭐	0.00%
src/ramstk/db/base.py	70.71% 🙂	71.30% 🙂	0.59% 👍
src/ramstk/exim/imports.py	75.52% ⭐	75.49% ⭐	-0.03% 👎
src/ramstk/models/init.py	%	%	%
src/ramstk/models/commondb/init.py	%	%	%
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	80.33% ⭐	80.32% ⭐	-0.01% 👎
src/ramstk/models/programdb/validation/record.py	82.61% ⭐	82.61% ⭐	0.00%
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/assistants/export.py	72.30% 🙂	72.26% 🙂	-0.04% 👎
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/reliability/panel.py	65.95% 🙂	65.96% 🙂	0.01% 👍
tests/analyses/test_allocation.py	86.89% ⭐	86.89% ⭐	0.00%
tests/models/programdb/test_program_manager.py	85.89% ⭐	85.89% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/reliability/panel.py	ReliabilityResultsPanel.__init__	0 ⭐	462 ⛔	21 ⛔	37.59% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/ramstk/analyses/milhdbk217f/models/semiconductor.py	calculate_part_stress_lambda_b	12 🙂	202 😞	14 😞	40.14% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/reliability/panel.py	ReliabilityInputPanel.__init__	0 ⭐	401 ⛔	17 ⛔	41.06% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/ramstk/analyses/milhdbk217f/models/semiconductor.py	calculate_part_stress	7 ⭐	260 ⛔	13 😞	42.69% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/ramstk/db/base.py	BaseDatabase.do_connect	5 ⭐	208 ⛔	15 😞	44.98% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication