[ENH] remove ampty authors, references

[Remi-Gau]

fixes #28
fixes #29
fixes #30

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 1.55%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	5.75 ⭐	5.81 ⭐	0.06 👎
Method Length	86.46 🙂	74.76 🙂	-11.70 👍
Working memory	8.65 🙂	8.30 🙂	-0.35 👍
Quality	63.32% 🙂	64.87% 🙂	1.55% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	907	937	30

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
bids2cite/authors.py	65.96% 🙂	65.08% 🙂	-0.88% 👎
bids2cite/bids2cite.py	54.41% 🙂	54.41% 🙂	0.00%
bids2cite/references.py	62.26% 🙂	62.14% 🙂	-0.12% 👎
tests/test_authors.py	96.26% ⭐	96.17% ⭐	-0.09% 👎
tests/test_bids2cite.py	76.83% ⭐	86.20% ⭐	9.37% 👍
tests/test_references.py	90.40% ⭐	94.37% ⭐	3.97% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
bids2cite/bids2cite.py	bids2cite	8 ⭐	471 ⛔	16 ⛔	33.54% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
bids2cite/authors.py	update_authors	13 🙂	198 😞	11 😞	44.28% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
bids2cite/references.py	get_reference_info_from_pmid	15 🙂	148 😞	11 😞	47.17% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
bids2cite/bids2cite.py	cli	9 🙂	234 ⛔	9 🙂	49.42% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods
bids2cite/authors.py	parse_author	11 🙂	157 😞	8 🙂	55.85% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[ghost]

Review on Crocodile

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #32 (4721cc8) into main (ec19b17) will increase coverage by 1.31%.
The diff coverage is 81.81%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #32      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.20%   67.51%   +1.31%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         503      508       +5     
  Branches      102      105       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          333      343      +10     
+ Misses        137      136       -1     
+ Partials       33       29       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
tests	67.51% <81.81%> (+1.31%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
bids2cite/references.py	74.07% <50.00%> (+4.62%)	⬆️
bids2cite/authors.py	71.31% <87.50%> (+1.22%)	⬆️
bids2cite/bids2cite.py	56.98% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.