Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thrustlimiter with BurnCommand - resolves #42 #62

Closed

Conversation

Peppie84
Copy link
Member

Thrustlimiter can now changed and the burn/maneuver time calculation are
now right

Thrustlimiter can now changed and the burn/maneuver time calculation are
now right
@Pezmc Pezmc mentioned this pull request May 31, 2014
@wms wms added this to the 1.4.0 milestone May 31, 2014
Peppie84 referenced this pull request in Peppie84/RemoteTech Jun 1, 2014
Jaidans fix with the right thrustlimitter calculation (#62)
@wms
Copy link
Contributor

wms commented Jun 2, 2014

@wms wms added the Staged label Jun 2, 2014
@wms wms mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2014
@Starstrider42
Copy link
Contributor

Question: does this resolve #22 in addition to #42? Trying to keep track of which legacy bugs have been addressed. 😁

@wms
Copy link
Contributor

wms commented Jun 2, 2014

@Starstrider42 Partially correct - it solves #22 - just checking #42

@wms
Copy link
Contributor

wms commented Jun 2, 2014

@Starstrider42 As I suspected it does not solve #42 (I misread the some of the commit message, I assumed it related to #22) - burns will observe thrust limiter settings, but they will not observe the throttle slider (ie, burns are always executed at 100% throttle, regardless of slider setting)

@Peppie84
Copy link
Member Author

Peppie84 commented Jun 2, 2014

Right its not #42 😄

@erendrake
Copy link
Member

Merged as part of #78

@erendrake erendrake closed this Jun 5, 2014
@Peppie84 Peppie84 deleted the fix-issue-42 branch June 6, 2014 21:56
Peppie84 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants