Wrong length check in UserDataHeaderImpl.java

[smarek]

Check in getApplicationPortAddressing16BitAddress() method of UserDataHeaderImpl is wrong, 16bit application port by docs ETSI TS 100 901 V7.5.0 (2001-12) section 9.2.3.24.4 is 4 octets (2 for destination and 2 for originator port)

In parser implementation this check is actually implemented correctly (see ApplicationPortAddressing16BitAddressImpl.java#L53 ), and these kind of checks might be eliminated from UserDataHeaderImpl.java if correct input to parser is checked on field-level.

Below proposed trivial fix diff against current master at 91be33c

diff --git a/map/map-impl/src/main/java/org/mobicents/protocols/ss7/map/smstpdu/UserDataHeaderImpl.java b/map/map-impl/src/main/java/org/mobicents/protocols/ss7/map/smstpdu/UserDataHeaderImpl.java
index aa750c8f3..f49677366 100644
--- a/map/map-impl/src/main/java/org/mobicents/protocols/ss7/map/smstpdu/UserDataHeaderImpl.java
+++ b/map/map-impl/src/main/java/org/mobicents/protocols/ss7/map/smstpdu/UserDataHeaderImpl.java
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ public class UserDataHeaderImpl implements UserDataHeader {
     @Override
     public ApplicationPortAddressing16BitAddress getApplicationPortAddressing16BitAddress() {
         byte[] buf = this.data.get(_InformationElementIdentifier_ApplicationPortAddressingScheme16BitAddress);
-        if (buf != null && buf.length == 1)
+        if (buf != null && buf.length == 4)
             return new ApplicationPortAddressing16BitAddressImpl(buf);
         else
             return null;

[vetss]

Hello @smarek

thanks for your feedback. Your note is correct.

May I ask you to read THE TELESTAX OPEN SOURCE PLAYBOOK:
https://telestax.com/open-source/#Contribute
and sign Contributor License Agreement

[smarek]

I signed CLA, not with github, but with corporate e-mail account, but https://github.com/smarek is listed as my profile, so you should be able to match me against list of signatures.

[vetss]

Thanks @smarek

I have added your fix by this commit 4c14755

Thanks for update.

[gsaslis]

@smarek thanks for contributing this! 👍

I've already added your name in our Contributors Hall of Fame 👏 . If you would like to open a PR so that we can merge this in properly, we'd also be happy to do that too. Just let me know ;)

[smarek]

@gsaslis thanks, this one is already fixed by mentioned commit, so i'll directly provide PR next time we find out something to fix. Cheers!

[gsaslis]

awesome!

(fwiw - i was just talking about you submitting a brand new PR with the same fix, so we can ensure the commit bears your name in GitHub. Probably just a minor detail now, but thought I'd check anyway ;) )

Looking forward to your future PRs !