-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changed default UserDefaults
from .standard
to our own Suite
#2046
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Thanks! |
283de18
to
18f14d6
Compare
I just did some extra testing with PurchaseTester and this is working as expected. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks awesome! Left a question re: DI
#if DEBUG | ||
/// The "default" `UserDefaults` to use for the SDK. | ||
/// | ||
/// Moving foward, this default is `UserDefaults.revenueCatSuite`, | ||
/// but existing users will continue using `UserDefaults.standard` for compatibility. | ||
/// This is determined by the presence of an app user ID in `UserDefaults.standard`. | ||
/// | ||
/// Computed property only in `DEBUG` to be able to test it under different conditions. | ||
/// In release mode, it gets cached. | ||
static var `default`: UserDefaults { .computeDefault() } | ||
#else | ||
static let `default`: UserDefaults = .computeDefault() | ||
#endif |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels like an odd workaround to solve a problem that the rest of the project solves with DI - we even pass in the userDefaults when initializing purchases.
Not saying that doing all the DI in one place is necessarily better, but it does have the advantage of looking exactly the same in all our SDKs, whereas this would be probably impossible to achieve in most languages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good point, we don't need to cache this because we only call it once!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed!
7a2f700
to
7dffafc
Compare
**This is an automatic release.** ### Bugfixes * Changed default `UserDefaults` from `.standard` to our own Suite (#2046) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) ### Other Changes * `Logging`: added log when configuring SDK in observer mode (#2065) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `PurchaseTesterSwiftUI`: added observer mode setting (#2052) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * Exposed `SystemInfo.observerMode` to simplify code (#2064) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `Result.init(catching:)` with `async` method (#2060) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * Updated schemes and project for Xcode 14.1 (#2081) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `PurchasesSubscriberAttributesTests`: simplified tests (#2056) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `DeviceCache`: removed `fatalError` for users not overriding `UserDefaults` (#2079) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `DeviceCache`: changed `NotificationCenter` observation to be received on posting thread (#2078) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `StoreKit1Wrapper`: added instance address when detecting transactions (#2055) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * Fixed lint issues with `SwiftLint 0.5.0` (#2076) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `NSData+RCExtensionsTests`: improved errors (#2043) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `APITester`: fixed warning in `SubscriptionPeriodAPI` (#2054) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) * `Integration Tests`: always run them in random order locally (#2068) via NachoSoto (@NachoSoto) Co-authored-by: NachoSoto <ignaciosoto90@gmail.com>
Fixes #2252, #2364, RevenueCat/react-native-purchases#579, [SDKONCALL-214], [SDKONCALL-238], [SDKONCALL-241]. See also #2078 and #2079. ### Background #2078 solved a potential deadlock in `DeviceCache`. This could happen when a background thread was in the middle of writing to `UserDefaults` through `DeviceCache`, and at the same time, the main thread wanted to read from it. This is normally fine, except that if there are any `NotificationCenter` observations on the `UserDefaults` used, the background thread would then post that notification and wait for the main thread, leading to a deadlock. What #2078 did was to use a different method to make sure that the observation was received in the calling thread. Additionally, #2079 avoided that observation whenever we used a different `UserDefaults`. ### Problem When the SDK changed to a custom `UserDefaults` (#2046), we made the choice to only do this if there was no prior data. However, if an app has prior RevenueCat data saved in `UserDefaults.standard`, that instance is used. This potential deadlock is possible for any app with prior data, that also contains observations to `UserDefaults`, either manually through `NotificationCenter`, or using something like `@AppStorage` with `SwiftUI`. ### Solution `DeviceCache.cachedAppUserID` is a very commonly used method. This PR changes it to an in-memory cache, initialized to the `UserDefaults` value. By doing that, most code paths that rely on this value won't risk deadlocking with `UserDefaults` writes that jump threads. ### Long term I've filed SDK-3034 to fully migrate data from `UserDefaults.standard` to avoid this problem altogether in the future.
Fixes #2252, #2364, RevenueCat/react-native-purchases#579, [SDKONCALL-214], [SDKONCALL-238], [SDKONCALL-241]. See also #2078 and #2079. ### Background #2078 solved a potential deadlock in `DeviceCache`. This could happen when a background thread was in the middle of writing to `UserDefaults` through `DeviceCache`, and at the same time, the main thread wanted to read from it. This is normally fine, except that if there are any `NotificationCenter` observations on the `UserDefaults` used, the background thread would then post that notification and wait for the main thread, leading to a deadlock. What #2078 did was to use a different method to make sure that the observation was received in the calling thread. Additionally, #2079 avoided that observation whenever we used a different `UserDefaults`. ### Problem When the SDK changed to a custom `UserDefaults` (#2046), we made the choice to only do this if there was no prior data. However, if an app has prior RevenueCat data saved in `UserDefaults.standard`, that instance is used. This potential deadlock is possible for any app with prior data, that also contains observations to `UserDefaults`, either manually through `NotificationCenter`, or using something like `@AppStorage` with `SwiftUI`. ### Solution `DeviceCache.cachedAppUserID` is a very commonly used method. This PR changes it to an in-memory cache, initialized to the `UserDefaults` value. By doing that, most code paths that rely on this value won't risk deadlocking with `UserDefaults` writes that jump threads. ### Long term I've filed SDK-3034 to fully migrate data from `UserDefaults.standard` to avoid this problem altogether in the future.
Fixes #2252, #2364, [SDKONCALL-214], [SDKONCALL-241]. See also #2078 and #2079. ### Background #2078 solved a potential deadlock in `DeviceCache`. This could happen when a background thread was in the middle of writing to `UserDefaults` through `DeviceCache`, and at the same time, the main thread wanted to read from it. This is normally fine, except that if there are any `NotificationCenter` observations on the `UserDefaults` used, the background thread would then post that notification and wait for the main thread, leading to a deadlock. What #2078 did was to use a different method to make sure that the observation was received in the calling thread. Additionally, #2079 avoided that observation whenever we used a different `UserDefaults`. ### Problem When the SDK changed to a custom `UserDefaults` (#2046), we made the choice to only do this if there was no prior data. However, if an app has prior RevenueCat data saved in `UserDefaults.standard`, that instance is used. This potential deadlock is possible for any app with prior data, that also contains observations to `UserDefaults`, either manually through `NotificationCenter`, or using something like `@AppStorage` with `SwiftUI`. ### Solution `DeviceCache.cachedAppUserID` is a very commonly used method. This PR changes it to an in-memory cache, initialized to the `UserDefaults` value. By doing that, most code paths that rely on this value won't risk deadlocking with `UserDefaults` writes that jump threads. ### Long term I've filed SDK-3034 to fully migrate data from `UserDefaults.standard` to avoid this problem altogether in the future. [SDKONCALL-214]: https://revenuecats.atlassian.net/browse/SDKONCALL-214?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [SDKONCALL-238]: https://revenuecats.atlassian.net/browse/SDKONCALL-238?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [SDKONCALL-241]: https://revenuecats.atlassian.net/browse/SDKONCALL-241?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
Fixes #2252, #2364, [SDKONCALL-214], [SDKONCALL-241]. See also #2078 and #2079. when a background thread was in the middle of writing to `UserDefaults` through `DeviceCache`, and at the same time, the main thread wanted to read from it. This is normally fine, except that if there are any `NotificationCenter` observations on the `UserDefaults` used, the background thread would then post that notification and wait for the main thread, leading to a deadlock. What #2078 did was to use a different method to make sure that the observation was received in the calling thread. Additionally, #2079 avoided that observation whenever we used a different `UserDefaults`. When the SDK changed to a custom `UserDefaults` (#2046), we made the choice to only do this if there was no prior data. However, if an app has prior RevenueCat data saved in `UserDefaults.standard`, that instance is used. This potential deadlock is possible for any app with prior data, that also contains observations to `UserDefaults`, either manually through `NotificationCenter`, or using something like `@AppStorage` with `SwiftUI`. `DeviceCache.cachedAppUserID` is a very commonly used method. This PR changes it to an in-memory cache, initialized to the `UserDefaults` value. By doing that, most code paths that rely on this value won't risk deadlocking with `UserDefaults` writes that jump threads. I've filed SDK-3034 to fully migrate data from `UserDefaults.standard` to avoid this problem altogether in the future. [SDKONCALL-214]: https://revenuecats.atlassian.net/browse/SDKONCALL-214?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [SDKONCALL-238]: https://revenuecats.atlassian.net/browse/SDKONCALL-238?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [SDKONCALL-241]: https://revenuecats.atlassian.net/browse/SDKONCALL-241?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
Fixes CSDK-16.
See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DDyed98RFpIvUwUPJcetc7X4fBhDzf-r1trC4g3zf4c/edit# for reasoning and documentation.
Motivation
The RevenueCat SDK has always used
UserDefaults.standard
as the default value. The advantage of this was simplicity, however, this brings a few challenges.Issues
UserDefaults
is itself thread-safe, our users might be observingUserDefaults.defaults
changes viaKVO
,NotificationCenter
, or@AppStorage
(see crash: EXC_BAD_ACCESS in 4.2.1, DeviceCache.swift - Line 123 #1527). We updateUserDefaults
from background threads, and users might be getting updates on those threads without handling thread-safety correctly.UserDefaults
(see https://rev.cat/userdefaults-crash).Using a custom
UserDefaults
solves all these issues.Change
The new
UserDefaults.revenueCatSuite
is used when:UserDefaults
parameterUserDefaults.standard
has no value forcom.revenuecat.userdefaults.appUserID.new
(the user hasn't used the SDK in that app before).Logged during app start:
Alternatives Considered
See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c2B4MNAFKs_DcFJ3OE_KnmryHCArBkjlZbAD9_kSXu0/edit#
We considered also migrating data for everyone into the new
UserDefaults
.This new approach is much simpler, less error prone, easier to implement, and maintain.
The only downside is that existing users won’t benefit from this change, but @aboedo correctly pointed out: if the app is working for them, no reason to change anything.
So in this way, this becomes a purely forward-looking improvement.