Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement Wordpress support #3

Open
Riduidel opened this issue Aug 15, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

Implement Wordpress support #3

Riduidel opened this issue Aug 15, 2013 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@Riduidel
Copy link
Owner

Wordpress.com has an export ... here https://riduidel.wordpress.com/wp-admin/export.php?type=export

Obviously, my blog address should be replaced by your own.
Riduidel pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2013
Yup, all that for #3 (or for the architecture allowing faster building
29428fd 
of #3, #4 and all the others)
@Riduidel
Copy link
Owner Author

Will add ROME for Wordpress extended RSS parsing

Riduidel pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2013
That issue #3 is going on fine (at the cost of a refactoring for all …
cd0ef1f 
…output).

The most visible change is that WordpressTest downloading backup from Wordpress now work OK.
The dark side being that, obviouslyh, download XML can't be parsed by JDOM/ROME and that parsing need some tweaking.
Riduidel pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2013
work is going on for #3 : i can read my blog backup, provided it's gi…
ccbf303 
…ven as a local file

(strangely enough, trying to directly downloading it result into strange encoding exceptions)
Anyway, once it's done, the next wall to be hit will be the one where all entries of Wordpress export are not blogs (images, as an example, are included)
Riduidel pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2013
For #3, I have now working export with the right encoding, correct de…
2e3c775 
…-htmlentitizing, and a good way to filter effective posts out of attachments
Riduidel pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2013
Changed excpected output for better respect of #3
a7be8db
Riduidel pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2014
Introduced comment in order to implement #3.
3b8eb69 
I must however confess I'm curretnly thinking about sending them to Discourse ... but which one , And isn't it shooting myself in the foot ?
@Riduidel
Copy link
Owner Author

Notice this will implement JBake import.

@Riduidel
Copy link
Owner Author

What is working now ?

  • posts
  • comments
  • medias

I don't know which of comments/medias implement first, even if I know the laziest media support would be direct link usage, whereas comments support requires more work, as I don't want comments to apepar in lists, but only on posts pages

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Riduidel