New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Misc Missing Functionality for Roaring64 bitmaps #549
Comments
If I may add a few to the list:
|
Dr-Emann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 23, 2024
The implementation was actually already written using an inclusive range already. See #549
Dr-Emann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 23, 2024
The implementation was actually already written using an inclusive range already. See #549
Dr-Emann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 23, 2024
The implementation was actually already written using an inclusive range already. See #549
Dr-Emann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 23, 2024
The implementation was actually already written using an inclusive range already. See #549
Dr-Emann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 23, 2024
The implementation was actually already written using an inclusive range already. See #549
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This is just a list of functionality which I noticed was missing in comparison to
roaring_bitmap_t
as I was adding bindings to croaring-rs. I may add more if I find anything else, rather than making more issues.roaring64_bitmap_clear
, to remove all data, and start from an empty bitmap(can this be done more efficiently thanroaring64_bitmap_remove_range_closed(0, UINT64_MAX)
). It seems likeroaring64_bitmap_remove_range_closed
could be optimized, it appears to loop through all high 48 bit combos, rather than skipping around using the ART.roaring64_bitmap_remove_range_closed(0, UINT64_MAX)
is now efficient.roaring64_bitmap_remove_run_compression
. This is probably only really useful after Provide serialization/deserialization functionality to the ART-based 64-bit roaring #542, to avoid run containers in the serialization when the reader won't understand themroaring64_bitmap_internal_validate
, mostly useful for tests, to ensure our assumptions are never broken (max art depth, things which should be sorted are, etc).roaring64_bitmap_flip
roaring64_bitmap_range_cardinality
is exclusive only, it's unfortunate thatroaring64_bitmap_cardinality(r)
can't be emulated byroaring64_bitmap_range_cardinality(r, 0, UINT64_MAX)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: