Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add reading of "Consumed Electricity" #16

Open
RobinFlikkema opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Add reading of "Consumed Electricity" #16

RobinFlikkema opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@RobinFlikkema
Copy link
Owner

RobinFlikkema commented Nov 17, 2023

This issue is a feature request to add support for reading new values from Luxtronik.

  • These are stored as parameters (it looks like that in this file); Therefore support for parameters has to be added.
  • These are only available in firmware v3.88 and above; So, logic should be implemented making sure that the app doesn't break for people using older firmwares.
  • Additionally, support for "Current Power" should be implemented.

See also: Bouni/python-luxtronik#100

@RobinFlikkema RobinFlikkema added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 17, 2023
@RobinFlikkema RobinFlikkema added this to the Second Release v1.1.0 milestone Nov 17, 2023
@RobinFlikkema RobinFlikkema self-assigned this Nov 17, 2023
RobinFlikkema added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2023
* Add support for Current Performance (Vermogen)(#16)
RobinFlikkema added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2023
…ters (#20)

* Bump version to v1.0.2

* Add support for Current Performance (Vermogen)(#16)

* Fixed translations for "Current Performance"

* Allow for both Parameters and Calculations
@RobinFlikkema
Copy link
Owner Author

So, apparently, for both "heatenergy" and "energy input" the "heat" part consists of heating and ZWE/Second Heatsource.

However, both require parameter 1059, which is weird as that would assume that the ZWE is always 1:1 for input:output energy. Problem is that this 1:1 could very well be correct for a second heat source

I need to put more time in to this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant