Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 7, 2020. It is now read-only.

[NEW] Missing support for SSO login #230

Closed
guss77 opened this issue Mar 6, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

[NEW] Missing support for SSO login #230

guss77 opened this issue Mar 6, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@guss77
Copy link

guss77 commented Mar 6, 2017

Your Rocket.Chat.Android version: 1.0.5

While the Cordoba application allows login using SSO methods configured on a deployed Rocket.Chat server, the new Android application only supports password login

@mmarif4u
Copy link

So far i see only Github, Google, Facebook, Twitter and Password based logins are implemented. By any chance, is there any work going on Gitlab SSO implementation?

@rafaelks rafaelks changed the title Missing support for SSO login [NEW] Missing support for SSO login Oct 5, 2017
@rafaelks
Copy link
Contributor

rafaelks commented Oct 5, 2017

We're going to handle all authentication methods soon.

@thef1sh
Copy link

thef1sh commented Jan 24, 2018

The 'Cordova' apps had a troubling update to the README file saying that their apps will be deprecated at the end of March. For those of us using these auth methods, if deprecated means delisted, we're without a mobile app for our instance unless this is resolved.

@rafaelks
Copy link
Contributor

@thef1sh We'll support all the authentication methods supported from Cordova by March, that's for sure.

@philipbrito
Copy link
Contributor

Currently (Android 2+), we are supporting the authentication with:

  • username + password
  • email + password
  • CAS
  • LDAP
  • Gitlab

Refs: #833 #871 #855 #965

We are working hard to put others (Github, Twitter, etc).

@brtptrs
Copy link

brtptrs commented Mar 28, 2018

I can confirm version 2.0.0-alpha1 is working with CAS Authentication. Thanks!!

@philipbrito
Copy link
Contributor

Update: Github, Google and Linkedin OAuth become supported.

Refs: #966 #969 #973

@rafaelks
Copy link
Contributor

rafaelks commented Apr 3, 2018

Let's close this issue, every method now has it's own issue, many of them are already present in 2.0.0.

@rafaelks rafaelks closed this as completed Apr 3, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants