Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

regression: Fix monitor validation logic for rooms & departments #29213

Merged

Conversation

KevLehman
Copy link
Contributor

@KevLehman KevLehman commented May 11, 2023

OC-939

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

Notes:
The ideal solution is to move that query override logic outside of the models, like we do for departments. This way, we would be able to remove the Promise.await on this PR

@KevLehman KevLehman added this to the 6.2.0 milestone May 11, 2023
@KevLehman KevLehman marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2023 17:39
@KevLehman KevLehman requested review from a team as code owners May 11, 2023 17:39
@KevLehman KevLehman requested a review from murtaza98 May 11, 2023 17:39
murtaza98
murtaza98 previously approved these changes May 11, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #29213 (bf1011a) into release-6.2.0 (a0509a4) will increase coverage by 2.21%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-6.2.0   #29213      +/-   ##
=================================================
+ Coverage          44.66%   46.87%   +2.21%     
=================================================
  Files                682      729      +47     
  Lines              12737    13876    +1139     
  Branches            2058     2196     +138     
=================================================
+ Hits                5689     6505     +816     
- Misses              6766     7057     +291     
- Partials             282      314      +32     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 46.84% <ø> (+2.18%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

tapiarafael
tapiarafael previously approved these changes May 11, 2023
@KevLehman KevLehman dismissed stale reviews from tapiarafael and murtaza98 via 539e863 May 11, 2023 20:00
@KevLehman KevLehman force-pushed the regression/monitor-validation-units-not-applied branch from c50dc97 to 539e863 Compare May 11, 2023 20:00
@KevLehman KevLehman requested review from a team as code owners May 11, 2023 20:00
@KevLehman KevLehman force-pushed the regression/monitor-validation-units-not-applied branch from 539e863 to bf1011a Compare May 11, 2023 20:02
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge and removed stat: needs QA labels May 11, 2023
@sampaiodiego sampaiodiego merged commit a48215e into release-6.2.0 May 11, 2023
40 checks passed
@sampaiodiego sampaiodiego deleted the regression/monitor-validation-units-not-applied branch May 11, 2023 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stat: QA tested stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants