Hot fix for erroneous colors #125
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
NOTE: I believe some of the color discrepencies reported by L3/Harris may be coming from the conversion where the Gulp/CSSNext generator created the stepped color increments. This is a triage fix to addres the basic concerns. This should be addressed in a more comprehensive design token effort
dmcalester
requested review from
markacianfrani,
Cheshire89,
Full-lifey and
cskerbo
cskerbo
approved these changes
May 5, 2021
markacianfrani
approved these changes
May 5, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NOTE: I believe some of the color discrepencies reported by L3/Harris
may be coming from the conversion where the Gulp/CSSNext generator
created the stepped color increments.
This is a triage fix to addres the basic concerns. This should be
addressed in a more comprehensive design token effort