Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Looking for methods on to create n-terminals that package more kb in a viral capsid using RFDiffusion. #195

Open
Hanoriega opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Hanoriega
Copy link

Thank you for this software. I have been using motif scaffolding and binder design. However, my main focus is to create n-terminals that would potentially package more kb preferably >5kb, to a viral protein that normally would only package 4.7. Is there a way?, and I want to disclose that I am not an avid coder, but I am learning. I want to use RFDiffusion to create n-terminals that package more kb in a viral capsid. How would I go about creating something like this using RFDiffusion? Do I have to re-create and train model myself? Or is there an option for this specific direction with this code? Please let me know your thoughts and advice, I appreciate it.

Heather

@roccomoretti
Copy link
Member

The purpose of RFDiffusion is to generate novel backbones. So the key in applying RFDiffusion to your biological problem is translating your specification ("package more kb") into a set of requirements for what that implies about the backbone of your protein structure. As it stands currently, that connection (how does a novel backbone help you to package more kb?) is too diffuse to be useful. But by thinking about your particular biological system, you may be able to come up with an approach. (e.g. "If I were able to take this domain here and make it smaller while preserving these contacts I could free up some space" or "If I could extend this domain here, I could expand the size of the diameter of the capsid.")

Depending on what those requirements are, you may be able to make an set of parameters which allows RFDiffusion to generate novel backbones which meet those requirements. As long as you can rephrase your problem in terms of novel backbone generation, you likely won't need to recreate or retrain the model. But if you can't rephrase it as a novel backbone generation problem, then RFDiffusion isn't the tool you need to use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants