Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

backend: explain why cdecl is treated differently when setting up the ABIs #1379

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2022
Merged

backend: explain why cdecl is treated differently when setting up the ABIs #1379

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2022

Conversation

liushuyu
Copy link
Contributor

  • backend: explain why cdecl is treated differently when setting up the ABIs

@liushuyu
backend: explain why cdecl is treated differently ...
ee051b3 
... when setting up the ABIs

Signed-off-by: Zixing Liu <liushuyu011@gmail.com>
@liushuyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Requested by @tschwinge in https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/pull/1375/files#r919778903

@philberty philberty self-requested a review July 14, 2022 10:32
@philberty philberty added this to In progress in GSoC 2022 - Constexpr via automation Jul 14, 2022
@philberty philberty added this to the Const Generics milestone Jul 14, 2022
@philberty
Copy link
Member

bors r+

philberty
philberty approved these changes Jul 14, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@philberty philberty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this!

GSoC 2022 - Constexpr automation moved this from In progress to Reviewer approved Jul 14, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jul 14, 2022

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit ab9f7f2 into Rust-GCC:master Jul 14, 2022
GSoC 2022 - Constexpr automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done Jul 14, 2022
@philberty philberty removed this from Done in GSoC 2022 - Constexpr Aug 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@philberty philberty philberty approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cleanup documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Basic const generics and missing feat...
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@liushuyu @philberty