Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

See if using rustc as a library is worth it #12

Open
CohenArthur opened this issue Apr 21, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

See if using rustc as a library is worth it #12

CohenArthur opened this issue Apr 21, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
priority[low] Low priority issue

Comments

@CohenArthur
Copy link
Member

With #![rustc_private] you could use the RunCompiler API. Not sure if you want to do that though. I think just executing rustc with Command is good enough.

Originally posted by @flip1995 in #7 (comment)

Let's experiment and see if it makes a good difference in test generation time. Currently, generating all test suites takes around 7 minutes which is quite long but not "horrible"
@CohenArthur CohenArthur added the priority[low] Low priority issue label Jun 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
priority[low] Low priority issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@CohenArthur