Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aes-gcm: use more descriptive generic parameter names #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2020

Conversation

tarcieri
Copy link
Member

@tarcieri tarcieri commented Jun 9, 2020

Renames the generic parameters:

  • B => Aes to reflect it should be instantiated with AES
  • N => NonceSize which is consistent with the associated type name

Renames the generic parameters:

- `B` => `Aes` to reflect it should be instantiated with AES
- `N` => `NonceSize` which is consistent with the associated type name
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #166 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #166   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.58%   93.58%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines         639      639           
=======================================
  Hits          598      598           
  Misses         41       41           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
aes-gcm/src/ctr.rs 92.30% <100.00%> (ø)
aes-gcm/src/lib.rs 94.23% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9c5540b...0cb16c1. Read the comment docs.

@tarcieri tarcieri merged commit 27f1530 into master Jun 9, 2020
@tarcieri tarcieri deleted the aes-gcm/more-descriptive-generic-parameters branch June 9, 2020 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants