Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

<unitDate> comments from Indiana #162

Closed
rockivist opened this issue May 6, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

<unitDate> comments from Indiana #162

rockivist opened this issue May 6, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@rockivist
Copy link
Member

rockivist commented May 6, 2013

UNIT DATE

  1. There is no easy way of adopting either of the two options for recording
    dates (<unitDate> or <unitDateStructured>), which will make it difficult for
    collection managers to migrate their legacy EAD finding aids into the new
    standard.

Submitted on Thursday, April 25, 2013 - 4:02pm
Submitted values are:

Name: Julie Hardesty
Affiliation: Indiana University EAD Working Group
Does this represent an official comment from your affiliated group? Yes

@rockivist
Copy link
Member Author

Closed. For final beta decision re: unitdate elements see #235

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant