Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editable value fields extended for properties of enum type #89

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 5, 2019
Merged

Editable value fields extended for properties of enum type #89

merged 9 commits into from
Nov 5, 2019

Conversation

PetyaMarkovaBogdanova
Copy link
Contributor

It would be helpful to have visual presentation of what other options are when it comes to control properties of UI5 enum types. In this change they are added as options in a select box and can be changed dynamically. It is gaining better user experience.

It would be helpful to have visual presentation of what other options are when it comes to control properties of UI5 enum types. In this change they are added as options in a select box and can be changed dynamically. It is gaining better user experience.
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 1, 2019

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

jdichev and others added 6 commits October 7, 2019 16:00
1. JSDoc updated
2. Using internal method to determine whether a
type is enum or not.
1. JSDoc updated
2. Using internal method to determine whether a
type is enum or not.
…nto editable-values-options

# Conflicts:
#	app/scripts/modules/injected/controlUtils.js
Copy link
Contributor

@kineticjs kineticjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All feedback is reflected. Also looks good in testing.

@PetyaMarkovaBogdanova PetyaMarkovaBogdanova merged commit 13f0412 into SAP:master Nov 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants