-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Assignee function for events #2746
Comments
Hi @GabrielTec251, |
@GabrielTec251 I'm trying to step in and do what you need, even though you don't pay me anything for it. I have already explained that this results from the arrangements with our client, so the acknowledged action will not change. The rest works as in previous versions. If this doesn't suit you, you can use older versions and everyone will be happy. |
@GabrielTec251 |
As I said, I'm sorry, it wasn't my intention; If there is any way I can contribute, I would be grateful. |
I'm looking for a way to show how sorry I am for this inconvenience; and I was also informed that I made some mistakes in your semantics; for example, here we don't use "I would like" before asking for something, and that may have sounded negative; we usually say "I want" Maybe for linguistic or cultural reasons some of the things I said sounded really bad, but I swear I was just trying to contribute; Once again, I am very sorry for the inconvenience |
@GabrielTec251 |
What you proposed is useful, yes, I didn't understand it at first, when I came to understand the conversation had already unfolded, it was my mistake, you just tried to help |
Could you forgive me for my mistake? I am very grateful for your work This solution is perfect, now that I understand it will be of great help f it is still possible, I would like you to accept my apology and implement your solution; or at least accept the apology, it is of great personal importance to me |
@GabrielTec251 I don't fully understand your reaction, I just wanted to know if we can help with your problem, I don't feel offended etc. The only problem I had was that in my opinion you were not interested in reaching an agreement, although maybe translation, but I guess that's also it is no longer relevant, as far as I am concerned, I do not feel offended, insulted, etc. in any sense. |
he solution you propose at the beginning is perfect ; Could you implement it please? Note: The translation changes the tone of what is said a lot, I thought I offended you and I'm relieved I didn't do that note 2: I'm going to take an English course to improve this |
@GabrielTec251 |
… V2_7_7__AddAssigneeColumnsToEvents to V2_8_0__AddAssigneeColumnsToEvents
Description
I would suggest adding an 'Assignee' function that would work as follows:
It has the same icon as acknowledge, but a different signature;It has the other icons, Assign icon 'user plus' and Assignee icon 'user minus';Edit:
Details
a) Available for active events,
b) Whose purpose is to record who and when the active event was assignee,
c) Behaves like a acknowledged, i.e. such an assignee event is not taken into account in the calculation highest alarm, but it does not disappear from the list of Pending events, so here it works similarly to silenced, with the difference that it is visible to all users; (Combination of acknowledged and silenced functions)
d) This can be done by one user and this assignment cannot be changed;
e) If the event receives the "Return to normal" status, ackonoledged appears instead of this function. Similarly, if the event has the status "No RTN".
Assign(user plus) and Assignee(user minus) for Urgent event
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/35842300/336853476-c63730c6-9168-4c8d-8549-f4b815c511fa.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjExMzcwOTUsIm5iZiI6MTcyMTEzNjc5NSwicGF0aCI6Ii8zNTg0MjMwMC8zMzY4NTM0NzYtYzYzNzMwYzYtOTE2OC00YzhkLTg1NDktZjRiODE1YzUxMWZhLnBuZz9YLUFtei1BbGdvcml0aG09QVdTNC1ITUFDLVNIQTI1NiZYLUFtei1DcmVkZW50aWFsPUFLSUFWQ09EWUxTQTUzUFFLNFpBJTJGMjAyNDA3MTYlMkZ1cy1lYXN0LTElMkZzMyUyRmF3czRfcmVxdWVzdCZYLUFtei1EYXRlPTIwMjQwNzE2VDEzMzMxNVomWC1BbXotRXhwaXJlcz0zMDAmWC1BbXotU2lnbmF0dXJlPWQzZjQzNDk5ZmMyYmU3ZWVhZjVhMzBiZGM2MTFkMGQ4ODgwMWMwNTIwYTc1YzVjZTk2ZjAxZjMwMzk0ZmMzMTcmWC1BbXotU2lnbmVkSGVhZGVycz1ob3N0JmFjdG9yX2lkPTAma2V5X2lkPTAmcmVwb19pZD0wIn0.Qgmj6IjAI2M7Xpr23QrIkmB_aXWsVtRZojtqRS2z-DM)
Specifications
Scada-LTS Version: 2.6.18
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: