Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extension of problems with submodules in fortran #3357

Closed
jglezplatas opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Extension of problems with submodules in fortran #3357

jglezplatas opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@jglezplatas
Copy link

Please bring your issue to the SCons users mailing list before filing an issue here

See: https://scons.org/bugs.html

If the issue is confirmed to be a bug please include the following information

  • Link to SCons Users thread discussing your issue.
  • Version of SCons
  • Version of Python
  • Which python distribution if applicable (python.org, cygwin, anaconda, macports, brew,etc)
  • How you installed SCons
  • What Platform are you on? (Linux/Windows and which version)
  • How to reproduce your issue? Please include a small self contained reproducer. Likely a SConstruct should do for most issues.
  • How you invoke scons (The command line you're using "scons --flags some_arguments")
@jglezplatas
Copy link
Author

Hello,
I have found an extension of the problem reported as #3135 (May2018) about
"Does not handle fortran submodules and type bound procedures correctly".

For this case, someone give a solution to compile this type of files that it
works only in a particular case but not in general (under my opinion).

I'm sending a zip file containing a modified version from previous example. The main difference is that now there are two aditional files.
The current version of SConstruct give again the problem. In this case, the files used are test_1.f90, test_2.f90, test_22.f90, test_submodules.f90.

If you change the version test_22.f90 by test_21.f90 the scons works without problem. But in general, test_22.f90 is also a correct file.

test_submodules.zip

@bdbaddog
Copy link
Contributor

Why create a new issue and then close ? I'd suggested adding your information to 3135

@jglezplatas
Copy link
Author

jglezplatas commented Apr 22, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants