Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a PO I want the SDD to have an architectural design of the system (SDD Section 3.1) #62

Closed
10 tasks done
Tracked by #51
ronalddenouden opened this issue May 31, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
10 tasks done
Tracked by #51
Assignees

Comments

@ronalddenouden
Copy link
Contributor

ronalddenouden commented May 31, 2024

Description

Section 3.1 of the SDD should detail the modular structure of the system, describing the composition and context: relations between the components (dependencies, flow), preferably graphical with textual explanation. This should include a high-level design, the front-end architecture (can look at/reuse the screens diagram from the URD), with an explanation of each of the pages, and diagram(s) with explanation of the back-end architecture.

Process

  • A draft version has been written (no term references)
  • Feedback has been given
  • The section has been refined after feedback (references are added for terms)

Acceptance criteria:

Section 3.1 of the SDD includes:

  • A diagram of the high-level design of the system
  • A textual explanation of the high-level design of the system
  • A diagram of the front-end architecture of the system
  • A textual explanation of the front-end architecture of the system
  • A textual explanation of the back-end architecture of the system
  • A diagram of the judge architecture of the system
  • A textual explanation of the judge architecture of the system
@vlhtg
Copy link

vlhtg commented Jun 5, 2024

I have written the sections for the Judge, IOModule and container. @Doodshoofdaapje said it is quite good and I understood that as being feedback.

@andreitudorp andreitudorp removed their assignment Jun 7, 2024
@TPGamesNL
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewed, LGTM for now, depending on how much detail we want it to have

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants