linux mesa driver and geometry shader #1768
Comments
binary1248
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2021
…3.2+ compatibility context as well. While the compatibility profile functionality is not 100% identical to the EXT/ARB functionality, the extent to which SFML makes use of geometry shaders should not pose any serious problems to a developer who is aware of the subtle differences. The current geometry shader example already requires GLSL 1.50 which was only available in OpenGL 3.2+. (Closes #1768)
|
@machinehead-rus Can you give PR #1769 a try? |
eXpl0it3r
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2021
…3.2+ compatibility context as well. While the compatibility profile functionality is not 100% identical to the EXT/ARB functionality, the extent to which SFML makes use of geometry shaders should not pose any serious problems to a developer who is aware of the subtle differences. The current geometry shader example already requires GLSL 1.50 which was only available in OpenGL 3.2+. (Closes #1768)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There is my sfml 2.5.1 opengl context info(OS fedora 33):
As you can see, there is no extension GL_ARB_geometry_shader4. So i can't use sf::Shader with geometry shader because of this, although i can actually use the geometry shader via direct OpenGL calls. Do we realy need this extension check for context 3.2+?
P.S. Sorry for my English
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: